Methods to limit attrition in longitudinal comparative effectiveness trials: lessons from the Lithium Treatment - Moderate dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder
- PMID: 22076437
- PMCID: PMC3700408
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774511427324
Methods to limit attrition in longitudinal comparative effectiveness trials: lessons from the Lithium Treatment - Moderate dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder
Abstract
Background: High attrition rates, which occur frequently in longitudinal clinical trials of interventions for bipolar disorder, limit the interpretation of results.
Purpose: The aim of this article is to present design approaches that limited attrition in the Lithium Treatment - Moderate dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder.
Methods: LiTMUS was a 6-month randomized, longitudinal multisite comparative effectiveness trial that enrolled bipolar participants who were at least mildly ill. Participants were randomized to either low to moderate doses of lithium or no lithium; other treatments needed for mood stabilization were administered in a guideline-informed, empirically supported, and personalized fashion to participants in both treatment arms.
Results: Components of the study design that may have contributed to low attrition (16%) among 283 participants randomized included the use of (1) an intent-to-treat design, (2) a randomized adjunctive single-blind design, (3) participant reimbursement, (4) assessment of intent to attend the next study visit (included a discussion of attendance obstacles when intention was low), (5) quality care with limited participant burden, and (6) target windows for study visits.
Limitations: The relationships between attrition and effectiveness and tolerability of treatment have not been analyzed yet.
Conclusions: These components of the LiTMUS design may have limited attrition and may inform the design of future randomized comparative effectiveness trials among similar patients and those from other difficult-to-follow populations.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00667745.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Lithium treatment -- moderate dose use study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder: rationale and design.Clin Trials. 2009 Dec;6(6):637-48. doi: 10.1177/1740774509347399. Epub 2009 Nov 23. Clin Trials. 2009. PMID: 19933719 Clinical Trial.
-
Using comparative effectiveness design to improve the generalizability of bipolar treatment trials data: contrasting LiTMUS baseline data with pre-existing placebo controlled trials.J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.052. Epub 2013 Jul 8. J Affect Disord. 2014. PMID: 23845385 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): a pragmatic trial of complex treatment for a complex disorder.Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):114-27. doi: 10.1177/1740774513512184. Epub 2013 Dec 17. Clin Trials. 2014. PMID: 24346608 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lithium for acute mania.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 1;6(6):CD004048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004048.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31152444 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of bipolar disorder: Review of evidence regarding quetiapine and lithium.J Affect Disord. 2016 Feb;191:256-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 25. J Affect Disord. 2016. PMID: 26688495 Review.
Cited by
-
Medication adherence in a comparative effectiveness trial for bipolar disorder.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 May;129(5):359-65. doi: 10.1111/acps.12202. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014. PMID: 24117232 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A novel application of the Intent to Attend assessment to reduce bias due to missing data in a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clin Trials. 2014 Aug;11(4):494-502. doi: 10.1177/1740774514531096. Epub 2014 May 28. Clin Trials. 2014. PMID: 24872362 Free PMC article.
-
To attend, or not to attend: Examining caregiver intentions and study compliance in a pediatric, randomized controlled trial.Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):223-230. doi: 10.1177/1740774519893307. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 31984781 Free PMC article.
-
Factors related to attrition from VA healthcare use: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans.J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S510-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2347-y. J Gen Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23807058 Free PMC article.
-
General medical burden in bipolar disorder: findings from the LiTMUS comparative effectiveness trial.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Jan;129(1):24-34. doi: 10.1111/acps.12101. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014. PMID: 23465084 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Thase ME. How should efficacy be evaluated in randomized clinical trials of treatments for depression? J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(Suppl 4):23–31. - PubMed
-
- Leon AC, Mallinckrodt CH, Chuang-Stein C, Archibald DG, Archer GE, Chartier K. Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: Methodological issues in psychopharmacology. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:1001–5. - PubMed
-
- Smith LA, Cornelius V, Warnock A, Tacchi MJ, Taylor D. Pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: A systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9:551–60. - PubMed
-
- Maarbjerg K, Aagaard J, Vestergaard P. Adherence to Lithium Prophylaxis: I. Clinical Predictors and Patient’s Reasons for Nonadherence. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1988;21:121–5. - PubMed