Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;28(6):e837-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?

Elisa García et al. Midwifery. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: in debates around prenatal screening, it is frequently argued that responsible parenthood implies the acquisition of all available medical information about the health of a fetus, and use of this information to benefit the future child.

Objective: to analyse whether an offer of a prenatal test leads women to believe that they are morally obliged to control the health of their fetus.

Design: a substudy within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to assess the decision-making process of women when confronted with an offer of a prenatal screening test.

Participants: 111 women participating in an RCT were retrospectively asked their views on the meaning of testing within their parental duties.

Findings: testing was described as a personal option that goes beyond the normal parental responsibilities. Participants did not believe that they ought to control the health of the fetus or to avoid disability. A duty to test was only reported when the birth of a disabled child would have a negative impact on family life.

Conclusion: women's accounts suggest that two main factors are involved in making testing morally obligatory: (1) the woman's views on her moral duties to her family; and (2) the expected burden of a disabled child on the well-being of the family. A family-centred approach would be more suitable to assess the moral imperative character of testing than women's ethical views about their moral duties towards their unborn child.

Implications: a test offer should not be limited to communication of the characteristics of screening and the meaning of the test results. In helping women to assess the meaning of testing within their parental duties, counselling should include the family situation in which women have to decide, the women's expectations about living with a child with Down's syndrome or any other disability, and the women's views on their commitments towards their family.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources