Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;60(5):586-601.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00672.x.

Relationship-Specific Investments, Family Chaos, and Cohabitation Dissolution Following a Non-marital Birth

Affiliations

Relationship-Specific Investments, Family Chaos, and Cohabitation Dissolution Following a Non-marital Birth

Claire M Kamp Dush. Fam Relat. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Predictors of two types of cohabitation dissolution, dissolution with a continued romantic relationship and without (i.e. breakup), were examined using data from mothers cohabiting at the time of a non-marital birth in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (n = 1624). Life tables indicated 64% of unions dissolved within 5 years; of these, 76% broke-up. Black mothers had the highest rates of dissolution. Maximum likelihood discrete-time event history results revealed that younger mothers were more likely to experience cohabitation dissolution into a breakup. Fewer relationship-specific investments and more family chaos were also associated with greater risk of cohabitation dissolution into a breakup. Mothers' multipartnered fertility and fewer relationship-specific investments were associated with greater risk of cohabitation dissolution with a continued romantic relationship. Post-dissolution, mothers who maintained a romantic relationship were more likely to reenter a union with their former partner while mothers whose union broke-up most often remained so.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship status two to four years after initial cohabitation dissolution by type of cohabitation dissolution (n = 676). Asterisks mark significant differences in relationship status following initial cohabitation dissolution by type of cohabitation dissolution on z tests of the equality of proportions. + p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addo F, Sassler S. Financial arrangements and relationship quality among low-income couples. Family Relations. 2010;59:408–423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison PD. Event history analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1984.
    1. Allison PD. Unpublished workshop notes. Philadelphia, PA: Statistical Horizons; 2006. Notes from event history and survival analysis using Stata.
    1. Allison PD. Unpublished workshop notes. Philadelphia, PA: Statistical Horizons; 2008. Notes from missing data.
    1. Amato PR. Consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2000;62:1269–1287.