Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;40(12):1061-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1849-8.

[Which hip articulation bearing for which patient? : Tribology of the future]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Which hip articulation bearing for which patient? : Tribology of the future]

[Article in German]
M M Morlock et al. Orthopade. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Replacement of the hip joint has become an exceptionally successful procedure since the inauguration of the low friction principle by Charnley. Aseptic osteolysis and joint dislocation have been addressed by the development of wear-optimized materials and the introduction of larger heads. As an increase in head diameter against polyethylene causes wear increase, larger hard-on-hard bearings were introduced, which exhibit reduced wear and reduced dislocation risk with increasing head diameter. These findings were derived from standard simulator testing, not sufficiently considering the risk of fluid film breakdown under adverse conditions, which can cause a dramatic increase in wear and friction proportional to the head diameter. Such adverse conditions can occur clinically in patients due to several factors and have caused the presently observed unexpected problems with these new designs. Standardized preclinical testing has to be viewed as a minimum requirement but certainly not as a guarantee for the clinical success of new materials and designs even if the testing is adapted to the current patient requirements, which is presently not the case. The future of tribology lies in the prevention of adverse conditions in patients, the improvement and optimized use of proven existing materials and not in the use of new materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):203-7 - PubMed
    1. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):231-7 - PubMed
    1. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 Aug 15;66(2):567-73 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2328-32 - PubMed
    1. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2008;18(2):151-65 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources