Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;22(3):123-30.
doi: 10.1007/s10286-011-0151-5. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Autonomic mechanisms associated with heart rate and vasoconstrictor reserves

Affiliations

Autonomic mechanisms associated with heart rate and vasoconstrictor reserves

Victor A Convertino et al. Clin Auton Res. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhage is accompanied by baroreflex-mediated tachycardia and vasoconstriction. The difference between baseline and maximum responses is defined as the heart rate (HR) and vasoconstrictor 'reserve'.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that higher HR and vasoconstrictor reserves in subjects with high tolerance (HT) to central hypovolemia is associated with greater reserve for sympathoexcitation and vagal withdrawal compared with low tolerant (LT) subjects.

Methods: R-R intervals (RRI), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), estimated stroke volume, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) designed to induce pre-syncope. Subjects with tolerance ≤ 60 mmHg LBNP were classified as LT (n = 22) while subjects who tolerated LBNP levels >60 mmHg were classified as HT (n = 56). Spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was assessed via RRI-SAP down-down sequences.

Results: HR reserve in HT subjects (+52 ± 2 bpm) was twofold greater (P < 0.001) than that in LT subjects (+27 ± 3 bpm). Vasoconstrictor reserve in the HT group (+3.4 ± 0.5 pru) was greater (P = 0.04) than that of the LT group (+1.9 ± 0.3 pru). HT subjects demonstrated greater (P ≤ 0.03) BRS reserve (-14.2 ± 1.8 ms/mmHg) and MSNA reserve (+41 ± 2 bursts/min) compared with LT subjects (-7.4 ± 1.7 ms/mmHg and +26 ± 7 bursts/min).

Interpretation: Our data support the hypothesis that greater physiological reserve capacity for tachycardia and vasoconstriction related to high tolerance to central hypovolemia is associated with greater reserves for sympathoexcitation and cardiac vagal withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 May;65(5):404-11 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1990 Dec;11 Suppl I:26-32 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 May;196(5):679-84 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1998 Dec;275(6):R1909-20 - PubMed
    1. J Emerg Med. 1986;4(5):383-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources