Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov-Dec;9(6):538-45.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1322.

Patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scale: development and validation

Affiliations

Patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scale: development and validation

Matthew J Ridd et al. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

PURPOSE Because patient-doctor continuity has been measured in its longitudinal rather than its personal dimension, evidence to show that seeing the same doctor leads to better patient care is weak. Existing relational measures of patient-doctor continuity are limited, so we developed a new patient self-completion instrument designed to specifically measure patient-doctor depth of relationship. METHODS Draft versions of the questionnaire were tested with patients in face-to-face interviews and 2 rounds of pilot testing. The final instrument was completed by patients attending routine appointments with their general practitioner, and some were sent a follow-up questionnaire. Scale structure, validity, and reliability were assessed. RESULTS Face validity of candidate items was confirmed in interviews with 11 patients. Data from the pilot rounds 1 (n = 375) and 2 (n = 154) were used to refine and shorten the questionnaire. The final instrument comprised a single scale of 8 items and had good internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .93). In the main study (N = 490), seeing the same doctor was associated with deep patient-doctor relationships, but the relationship appeared to be nonlinear (overall adjusted odds ratio = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Test-retest reliability in a sample of participants (n = 154) was good (intracluster correlation coefficient 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97). CONCLUSIONS The Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale is a novel, conceptually grounded questionnaire that is easy for patients to complete and is psychometrically robust. Future research will further establish its validity and answer whether patient-doctor depth of relationship is associated with improved patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale development and validation. a Of 189 patients, 93 were younger than 16 years; 45 did not attend/did not wait; 30 unable to complete questionnaire; 14 nonqualifying consultations; 7 other reasons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of patient-doctor depth-of-relationship scores.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted probability (unadjusted quadratic logistic regression model) of deep patient-doctor relationship with number of consultations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hjortdahl P. Ideology and reality of continuity of care. Fam Med. 1990;22(5):361–364 - PubMed
    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003; 327(7425):1219–1221 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):445–451 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(2):159–166 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman G, Hjortdahl P. What future for continuity of care in general practice? BMJ. 1997;314(7098):1870–1873 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types