Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice
- PMID: 22085317
- PMCID: PMC4074540
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108660
Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice
Abstract
Background: Obesity and its cardiovascular complications are extremely common medical problems, but evidence on how to accomplish weight loss in clinical practice is sparse.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to examine the effects of two behavioral weight-loss interventions in 415 obese patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were recruited from six primary care practices; 63.6% were women, 41.0% were black, and the mean age was 54.0 years. One intervention provided patients with weight-loss support remotely--through the telephone, a study-specific Web site, and e-mail. The other intervention provided in-person support during group and individual sessions, along with the three remote means of support. There was also a control group in which weight loss was self-directed. Outcomes were compared between each intervention group and the control group and between the two intervention groups. For both interventions, primary care providers reinforced participation at routinely scheduled visits. The trial duration was 24 months.
Results: At baseline, the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) for all participants was 36.6, and the mean weight was 103.8 kg. At 24 months, the mean change in weight from baseline was -0.8 kg in the control group, -4.6 kg in the group receiving remote support only (P<0.001 for the comparison with the control group), and -5.1 kg in the group receiving in-person support (P<0.001 for the comparison with the control group). The percentage of participants who lost 5% or more of their initial weight was 18.8% in the control group, 38.2% in the group receiving remote support only, and 41.4% in the group receiving in-person support. The change in weight from baseline did not differ significantly between the two intervention groups.
Conclusions: In two behavioral interventions, one delivered with in-person support and the other delivered remotely, without face-to-face contact between participants and weight-loss coaches, obese patients achieved and sustained clinically significant weight loss over a period of 24 months. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00783315.).
Conflict of interest statement
No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
Obesity treatment in primary care--are we there yet?N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):2030-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1111487. Epub 2011 Nov 15. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 22085319 No abstract available.
-
Obesity: Counseling emPOWERs patients to lose weight.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Nov 29;9(1):4. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.186. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 22124319 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. In-person or remote behavioral interventions for obesity were better than a self-directed approach.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):JC3-10, JC3-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-02010. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22431696 No abstract available.
-
Primary care interventions for obesity: behavioural support, whether delivered remotely or in person, facilitates greater weight loss over 2 years than self-directed weight loss.Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Jul;15(3):89-90. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2012-100530. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Evid Based Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22511650 No abstract available.
-
Eficacia de dos intervenciones para lareducción de peso en la práctica clínica.Rev Clin Esp. 2012 May;212(5):260. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2011.12.011. Rev Clin Esp. 2012. PMID: 22655301 Spanish. No abstract available.
References
-
- Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–241. - PubMed
-
- Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2005;293:1861–1867. - PubMed
-
- Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who’s paying? Health Aff (Millwood) 2003 Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-219-W3-226. - PubMed
-
- Neter JE, Stam BE, Kok FJ, Grobbee DE, Geleijnse JM. Influence of weight reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension. 2003;42:878–884. - PubMed