Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse"
- PMID: 22086260
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1581-2
Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse"
Abstract
In July of 2011 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a safety communication entitled "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse." The stated purpose of this communication is to inform health care providers and patients that serious complications with placement of this mesh are not rare and that it is not clear that these repairs are more effective than nonmesh repair. The comments regarding efficacy are based on a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1996-2011 conducted by the FDA. Our review of the literature during this time yields some different conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of mesh use in prolapse repair. It may be useful to consider this information prior to making recommendations regarding mesh use in prolapse surgery according to the recent UPDATE.
Similar articles
-
Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: more FDA concerns--positive reactions are possible.Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan;23(1):11-3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1580-3. Epub 2011 Nov 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22086259 No abstract available.
-
Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3040-6. Epub 2016 May 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 27209310
-
Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):5-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182495885. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22453257
-
Vaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: Controversies, Current Use, and Complications.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;58(4):740-53. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000148. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26512439 Review.
-
Anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair using synthetic mesh.Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Jun;13(3):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0246-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2012. PMID: 22588645 Review.
Cited by
-
On the relevance of uniaxial tensile testing of urogynecological prostheses: the effect of displacement rate.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):161-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1815-y. Epub 2012 May 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22584925
-
"Central Road" cystoscopic finding: The road to worsened incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.IJU Case Rep. 2020 Jul 1;3(5):204-206. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12189. eCollection 2020 Sep. IJU Case Rep. 2020. PMID: 32914076 Free PMC article.
-
Lower exposure rates of partially absorbable mesh compared to nonabsorbable mesh for cystocele treatment: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):749-58. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1929-2. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22930216 Clinical Trial.
-
A clinical study on the trocar-guided mesh repair system for pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016 May;59(3):208-13. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.208. Epub 2016 May 13. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27200311 Free PMC article.
-
Could the vaginal wall sling still have a role after FDA's warning? the functional outcomes at 20 years.Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Mar 7;14:17562872221084391. doi: 10.1177/17562872221084391. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2022. PMID: 35281320 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical