Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(11):e27071.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027071. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Serum microRNA expression profile distinguishes enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus 16 infections in patients with hand-foot-and-mouth disease

Affiliations

Serum microRNA expression profile distinguishes enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus 16 infections in patients with hand-foot-and-mouth disease

Lunbiao Cui et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Altered circulating microRNA (miRNA) profiles have been noted in patients with microbial infections. We compared host serum miRNA levels in patients with hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) caused by enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus 16 (CVA16) as well as in other microbial infections and in healthy individuals. Among 664 different miRNAs analyzed using a miRNA array, 102 were up-regulated and 26 were down-regulated in sera of patients with enteroviral infections. Expression levels of ten candidate miRNAs were further evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR assays. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that six miRNAs (miR-148a, miR-143, miR-324-3p, miR-628-3p, miR-140-5p, and miR-362-3p) were able to discriminate patients with enterovirus infections from healthy controls with area under curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.828 to 0.934. The combined six miRNA using multiple logistic regression analysis provided not only a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 92.7% but also a unique profile that differentiated enterovirial infections from other microbial infections. Expression levels of five miRNAs (miR-148a, miR-143, miR-324-3p, miR-545, and miR-140-5p) were significantly increased in patients with CVA16 versus those with EV71 (p<0.05). Combination of miR-545, miR-324-3p, and miR-143 possessed a moderate ability to discrimination between CVA16 and EV71 with an AUC value of 0.761. These data indicate that sera from patients with different subtypes of enteroviral infection express unique miRNA profiles. Serum miRNA expression profiles may provide supplemental biomarkers for diagnosing and subtyping enteroviral HFMD infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Differential serum expression levels of ten miRNAs in healthy control and patients with enterovirus infection.
Serum levels of miR-140-5p, miR-143, miR-148a, miR-362-3p, miR-455-5p, miR-324-3p, miR-206, and miR-628-3p except for miR-545 and miR-597 were significantly higher in patients with enterovirus infection than those in the control group. **, p<0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for expression changed miRNAs to distinguish enterovirus infection from healthy control.
Combination of miR-148a, miR-143, miR-324-3p, miR-628-3p, miR-130-5p, and miR-362-3p showed stronger distinguish efficiency. The AUC of 0.989 was obtained by combining above six miRNAs.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Differential serum expression levels of ten miRNAs in EV71 group and CVA16 group.
Serum levels of miR-148a, miR-143, miR-324-3p, miR-545, miR-140-5p, were significantly higher in CVA16 group than those in the EV71 group. *, p<0.05. **, p<0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for expression changed miRNAs to distinguish CVA16 infection from EV71 infection.
ROC curve of miR-545 (A), miR-324-3p (B), and miR-143 (C) showed moderate distinguish efficiency. The AUC was mild increased to 0.761 through combining above three miRNAs (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ding NZ, Wang XM, Sun SW, Song Q, Li SN, et al. Appearance of mosaic enterovirus 71 in the 2008 outbreak of China. Virus Res. 2009;145:157–161. - PubMed
    1. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The Office of the World Health Organization in China. Report on the Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak in Fuyang City, Anhui Province and the Prevention and Control in China. 2008. Available: http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/591D6A7B-FB15-4E94-A1E9-1D3381847D6....
    1. Shih SR, Stollar V, Lin JY, Chang SC, Chen GW, et al. Identification of genes involved in the host response to enterovirus 71 infection. J Neurovirol. 2004;10:293–304. - PubMed
    1. Leong WF, Chow VT. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of rhabdomyosarcoma cells reveal differential cellular gene expression in response to enterovirus 71 infection. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:565–580. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottwein E, Cullen BR. Viral and cellular microRNAs as determinants of viral pathogenesis and immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3:375–387. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms