Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 16:11:314.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-314.

A framework and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care

Sarah S Slaghuis  1 , Mathilde M H Strating, Roland A Bal, Anna P Nieboer
Affiliations

A framework and a measurement instrument for sustainability of work practices in long-term care

Sarah S Slaghuis et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In health care, many organizations are working on quality improvement and/or innovation of their care practices. Although the effectiveness of improvement processes has been studied extensively, little attention has been given to sustainability of the changed work practices after implementation. The objective of this study is to develop a theoretical framework and measurement instrument for sustainability. To this end sustainability is conceptualized with two dimensions: routinization and institutionalization.

Methods: The exploratory methodological design consisted of three phases: a) framework development; b) instrument development; and c) field testing in former improvement teams in a quality improvement program for health care (N teams = 63, N individual = 112). Data were collected not until at least one year had passed after implementation.Underlying constructs and their interrelations were explored using Structural Equation Modeling and Principal Component Analyses. Internal consistency was computed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. A long and a short version of the instrument are proposed.

Results: The χ2- difference test of the -2 Log Likelihood estimates demonstrated that the hierarchical two factor model with routinization and institutionalization as separate constructs showed a better fit than the one factor model (p < .01). Secondly, construct validity of the instrument was strong as indicated by the high factor loadings of the items. Finally, the internal consistency of the subscales was good.

Conclusions: The theoretical framework offers a valuable starting point for the analysis of sustainability on the level of actual changed work practices. Even though the two dimensions routinization and institutionalization are related, they are clearly distinguishable and each has distinct value in the discussion of sustainability. Finally, the subscales conformed to psychometric properties defined in literature. The instrument can be used in the evaluation of improvement projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic representation of the framework.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Buchanan D, Fitzgerald L, Ketley D, Gollop R, Jones, Lamont S, Neath, Whitby. No going back: a review of the literature on sustaining organisational change. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2005;7(3):189–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00111.x. - DOI
    1. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82(4):581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldman MS, Pentland BT. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003;48(1):94–118. doi: 10.2307/3556620. - DOI
    1. Feldman MS, Rafaeli A. Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies. 2002;39:309. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00294. - DOI
    1. Feldman MS. Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science. 2000;11(6):611–629. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources