Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;130(5):EL358-64.
doi: 10.1121/1.3647263.

Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences

Affiliations

Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences

Christopher A Brown et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Listeners' ability to discriminate interaural time difference (ITD) changes in low-frequency noise was determined as a function of differences in the noise spectra delivered to each ear. An ITD was applied to Gaussian noise, which was bandpass filtered using identical high-pass, but different low-pass cutoff frequencies across ears. Thus, one frequency region was dichotic, and a higher-frequency region monotic. ITD thresholds increased as bandwidth to one ear (i.e., monotic bandwidth) increased, despite the fact that the region of interaural spectral overlap remained constant. Results suggest that listeners can process ITD differences when the spectra at two ears are moderately different.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic depicting the relationship of the noise spectra at the left (top row) and right (bottom row) ears used. The two vertical dashed lines encompass the ISO region, which is the spectral region that is present at both ears. The arrow represents the change to the stimuli that occurred due to the manipulation of interest, and the dotted plot represents the starting point of the manipulation. The low-pass cutoff frequency of the band of noise delivered to the right ear was initially the same as that for the left ear, and was systematically increased in frequency.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(Color online) ITD thresholds, in μs, for the five listeners as a function of the difference in low-pass cutoff frequency (ΔLP) between the two ears, which is expressed in 1∕3 octaves. The left panel depicts data when the base low-pass cutoff frequency was 125 Hz, the right panel shows 250-Hz data (see Table Table 1.).

References

    1. Brown, C. A., and Bacon, S. P. (2007). “The effect of interaural differences of time on speech intelligibility in simulated electric-acoustic hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 3093–3093.
    1. Brown, C. A., and Bacon, S. P. (2009). “Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone,” Ear Hear. 30, 489–493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buell, T. N., and Hafter, E. R. (1991). “Combination of binaural information across frequency bands,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1894–1900. - PubMed
    1. Fitzpatrick, D. C., and Kuwada, S. (2001). “Tuning to interaural time differences across frequency,” J. Neurosci. 21, 4844–4851. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francart, T., and Wouters, J. (2007). “Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2826–2831. - PubMed

Publication types