Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Oct 14;17(38):4321-33.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i38.4321.

A meta-analysis of lamivudine for interruption of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of lamivudine for interruption of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus

Lei Han et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To determine the therapeutic effect of lamivudine in late pregnancy for the interruption of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Methods: Studies were identified by searching available databases up to January 2011. Inclusive criteria were HBV-carrier mothers who had been involved in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with lamivudine treatment in late pregnancy, and newborns or infants whose serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) or HBV DNA had been documented. The relative risks (RRs) for interruption of MTCT as indicated by HBsAg, HBV DNA or HBeAg of newborns or infants were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the efficacy of lamivudine treatment.

Results: Fifteen RCTs including 1693 HBV-carrier mothers were included in this meta-analysis. The overall RR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.25-0.76; 8 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.04) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.23-0.47; 6 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.93) indicated by newborn HBsAg or HBV DNA. The RR was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.21-0.50; 6 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.46) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.50; 4 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.33) indicated by serum HBsAg or HBV DNA of infants 6-12 mo after birth. The RR (lamivudine vs hepatitis B immunoglobulin) was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.16-0.46; 5 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.94) and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.07-0.79; 3 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.60) indicated by newborn HBsAg or HBV DNA, respectively. In the mothers with viral load < 10⁶ copies/mL after lamivudine treatment, the efficacy (RR, 95% CI) was 0.33, 0.21-0.53 (5 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.82) for the interruption of MTCT, however, this value was not significant if maternal viral load was > 10⁶ copies/mL after lamivudine treatment (P = 0.45, 2 RCTs), as indicated by newborn serum HBsAg. The RR (lamivudine initiated from 28 wk of gestation vs control) was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22-0.52; 7 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.92) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22-0.50; 5 RCTs; P(heterogeneity) = 0.86) indicated by newborn HBsAg or HBV DNA. The incidence of adverse effects of lamivudine was not higher in the mothers than in controls (P = 0.97). Only one study reported side effects of lamivudine in newborns.

Conclusion: Lamivudine treatment in HBV carrier-mothers from 28 wk of gestation may interrupt MTCT of HBV efficiently. Lamivudine is safe and more efficient than hepatitis B immunoglobulin in interrupting MTCT. HBV MTCT might be interrupted efficiently if maternal viral load is reduced to < 10⁶ copies/mL by lamivudine treatment.

Keywords: Efficacy; Hepatitis B virus; Lamivudine; Meta-analysis; Mother-to-child transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study recruitment. RCTs: Randomized controlled clinical trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of lamivudine treatment vs control (placebo or no intervention) on interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by newborn serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatment. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. HBeAg: Hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lamivudine treatment vs hepatitis B immunoglobulin in interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by newborn serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. CI: Confidence interval; HBIG: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; HBeAg: Hepatitis B e antigen; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of lamivudine vs control (placebo or no intervention) on interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of infants 6-12 mo after birth. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatment. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Influence of maternal viral load before or after lamivudine treatment on hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of newborns within 24 h after birth. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of lamivudine treatment starting time on interruption of mother-to-child transmission indicated by newborn hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Efficacy of lamivudine treatment in “high-quality” studies or “low-quality” studies in interruption of mother-to-child transmission indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of newborns. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.

References

    1. Lavanchy D. Worldwide epidemiology of HBV infection, disease burden, and vaccine prevention. J Clin Virol. 2005;34 Suppl 1:S1–S3. - PubMed
    1. Petrova M, Kamburov V. Breastfeeding and chronic HBV infection: clinical and social implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5042–5046. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai H, Zhang L, Ma L, Dou XG, Feng GH, Zhao GZ. Relationship of hepatitis B virus infection of placental barrier and hepatitis B virus intra-uterine transmission mechanism. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3625–3630. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang SL, Yue YF, Bai GQ, Shi L, Jiang H. Mechanism of intrauterine infection of hepatitis B virus. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:437–438. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee C, Gong Y, Brok J, Boxall EH, Gluud C. Effect of hepatitis B immunisation in newborn infants of mothers positive for hepatitis B surface antigen: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2006;332:328–336. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms