Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1905-27.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01301.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

Managed care and the diffusion of endoscopy in fee-for-service Medicare

Affiliations

Managed care and the diffusion of endoscopy in fee-for-service Medicare

Lee Rivers Mobley et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Medicare managed care penetration impacted the diffusion of endoscopy services (sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy) among the fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population during 2001-2006.

Methods: We model utilization rates for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy as impacted by both market supply and demand factors. We use spatial regression to perform ecological analysis of county-area utilization rates over two time intervals (2001-2003, 2004-2006) following Medicare benefits expansion in 2001 to cover colonoscopy for persons of average risk. We examine each technology in separate cross-sectional regressions estimated over early and later periods to assess differential effects on diffusion over time. We discuss selection factors in managed care markets and how failure to control perfectly for market selection might impact our managed care spillover estimates.

Results: Areas with worse socioeconomic conditions have lower utilization rates, especially for colonoscopy. Holding constant statistically the socioeconomic factors, we find that managed care spillover effects onto FFS Medicare utilization rates are negative for colonoscopy and positive for sigmoidoscopy. The spatial lag estimates are conservative and interpreted as a lower bound on true effects. Our findings suggest that managed care presence fostered persistence of the older technology during a time when it was rapidly being replaced by the newer technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expansion of Colonoscopy and Contraction of Sigmoidoscopy Procedure Utilization over Time among Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare Beneficiaries, 2001–2006 Notes. The maps in the four panels of this figure display sigmoidoscopy use rates in the top row and colonoscopy use rates in the bottom row. Moving left to right, the early period is defined as 2001–2003 and the late period is 2004–2006. Rates are defined as the sum of utilization in the 3 years divided by the average Medicare FFS population in the 3 years. Utilization was defined from extracts of 100 percent of Medicare claims files, 2001–2006. Use rate categories were defined identically in early and late periods to reveal changes in prevalence of use over time.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2007. “Technology Assessment: Cost-effectiveness of DNA Stool Testing to Screen for Colorectal Cancer” [accessed October 2010]. Available at http://www.cms.gov/determinationprocess/downloads/id52TA.pdf. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society (ACS) 2008. “New Guidelines to Prevent and Detect Colon Cancer” [accessed March 2011]. Available at http://www.cancer.org/AboutUs/DrLensBlog/post/2008/03/05/New-Guidelines-....
    1. American Cancer Society (ACS) 2010. “Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures” [accessed July 2011]. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerPreventionEarlyD....
    1. America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) Low-Income and Minority Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage Plans, 2002. 2005. AHIP Center for Policy and Research. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: http://www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/medicareadvantage051005_full.pdf.
    1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1988.

Publication types

MeSH terms