Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May;27(5):534-40.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1927-y. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

Performance of health literacy tests among older adults with diabetes

Julienne K Kirk  1 , Joseph G Grzywacz, Thomas A Arcury, Edward H Ip, Ha T Nguyen, Ronny A Bell, Santiago Saldana, Sara A Quandt
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of health literacy tests among older adults with diabetes

Julienne K Kirk et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Knowing a patient's health literacy can help clinicians and researchers anticipate a patient's ability to understand complex health regimens and deliver better patient-centered instructions and information. Poor health literacy has been linked with lower ability to function adequately in health care systems.

Objective: We evaluated and compared three measures of health literacy and performance among older patients with diabetes.

Design: Cross-sectional study utilizing in-person interviews conducted in participants' homes.

Participants: A tri-ethnic sample (n = 563) of African American, American Indian, and white older adults with diabetes from eight counties in south-central North Carolina.

Main measure: Participants completed interviews and health literacy assessments using the Short-Form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA), the Rapid Estimates of Adult Literacy in Medicine Short-Form (REALM-SF), or the Newest Vital Signs (NVS). Scores for reading comprehension and numeracy were calculated.

Results: Over 90% completed the S-TOFHLA numeracy and approximately 85% completed the S-TOFHLA reading and REALM-SF. Only 73% completed the NVS. The correlation of S-TOFHLA total scores with REALM-SF and NVS were 0.48 and 0.54, respectively. Age, gender, ethnic, educational and income differences in health literacy emerged for several instruments, but the pattern of results across the instruments was highly variable.

Conclusions: A large segment of older adults is unable to complete short-form assessments of health literacy. Among those who were able to complete assessments, the REALM-SF and NVS performed comparably, but their relatively low convergence with the S-TOFHLA raises questions about instrument selection when studying health literacy of older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Healthy People 2020. http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020. Accessed on October 16, 2011
    1. Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. 2004 [on-line]. Available http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Health-Literacy-A-Prescription-to-End-Co.... Accessed on October 16, 2011
    1. Wallace L. Patients’ health literacy skills: the missing demographic variable in primary care research. Annals Fam Med. 2006;4:85–6. doi: 10.1370/afm.501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nurss JR, Parker RM, Williams MV, Baker DW. The Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) 2. Snow Camp, NC: Peppercorn Books & Press; 2001.
    1. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, et al. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types