Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(11):e26653.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026653. Epub 2011 Nov 11.

Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story

Gillian Rhodes  1 , Hanne C Lie, Nishta Thevaraja, Libby Taylor, Natasha Iredell, Christine Curran, Shi Qin Claire Tan, Pia Carnemolla, Leigh W Simmons
Affiliations

Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story

Gillian Rhodes et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Most of what we know about what makes a face attractive and why we have the preferences we do is based on attractiveness ratings of static images of faces, usually photographs. However, several reports that such ratings fail to correlate significantly with ratings made to dynamic video clips, which provide richer samples of appearance, challenge the validity of this literature. Here, we tested the validity of attractiveness ratings made to static images, using a substantial sample of male faces. We found that these ratings agreed very strongly with ratings made to videos of these men, despite the presence of much more information in the videos (multiple views, neutral and smiling expressions and speech-related movements). Not surprisingly, given this high agreement, the components of video-attractiveness were also very similar to those reported previously for static-attractiveness. Specifically, averageness, symmetry and masculinity were all significant components of attractiveness rated from videos. Finally, regression analyses yielded very similar effects of attractiveness on success in obtaining sexual partners, whether attractiveness was rated from videos or static images. These results validate the widespread use of attractiveness ratings made to static images in evolutionary and social psychological research. We speculate that this validity may stem from our tendency to make rapid and robust judgements of attractiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The association between attractiveness rated from videos and static images of faces (N = 60).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philos T Roy Soc B. 2011;366:1638–1659. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Little AC, Perrett DI. Facial attractiveness. In: Adams RA Jr, Ambady N, Nakayama K, Shimojo S, editors. The science of social vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 164–185.
    1. Penton-Voak IS, Morrison ER. Structure, expression and motion in facial attractiveness. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 653–672.
    1. Rhodes G. The evolution of facial attractiveness. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199–226. - PubMed
    1. Zebrowitz LA. Ecological and social approaches to face perception. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 31–50.

Publication types