Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):523-43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01350.x. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

Comparative cost analysis of housing and case management program for chronically ill homeless adults compared to usual care

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative cost analysis of housing and case management program for chronically ill homeless adults compared to usual care

Anirban Basu et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the costs of a housing and case management program in a novel sample-homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses.

Data source: The study used data from multiple sources: (1) electronic medical records for hospital, emergency room, and ambulatory medical and mental health visits; (2) institutional and regional databases for days in respite centers, jails, or prisons; and (3) interviews for days in nursing homes, shelters, substance abuse treatment centers, and case manager visits. Total costs were estimated using unit costs for each service.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial of 407 homeless adults with chronic medical illnesses enrolled at two hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, and followed for 18 months.

Principal findings: Compared to usual care, the intervention group generated an average annual cost savings of (-)$6,307 per person (95 percent CI: -16,616, 4,002; p = .23). Subgroup analyses of chronically homeless and those with HIV showed higher per person, annual cost savings of (-)$9,809 and (-)$6,622, respectively. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis using unit costs.

Conclusion: The findings of this comprehensive, comparative cost analyses demonstrated an important average annual savings, though in this underpowered study these savings did not achieve statistical significance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00490581.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitivity Analyses of Variation in Unit Prices on Mean Incremental Effect on Total Annual Costs. For Each Utilization Category, Unit Prices Are Varied from 50 to 150 percent

References

    1. ACTG. 1999. “ACTG QOL 601-602 (QOL 601-2) Health Survey Manual” [accessed on November 9, 2011]. Available at https://www.fstrf.org/apps/cfmx/apps/actg/html/QOLForms/manualql601-2799....
    1. Brown E, Jr, Beauregard K. Regional Differences in Total and Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Selected Types of Office-Based Visits, 2004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Statistical Brief #157. January 2007. Available at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st157/stat157.pdf.
    1. Culhane DP, Metraux S, Hadley T. “The Impact of Supportive Housing for Homeless People with Severe Mental Illness on the Utilization of the Public Health, Corrections, and Emergency Shelter Systems: The New York-New York Initiative”. Housing Policy Debate. 2002;13 (1):1–48.
    1. Donavan S. 2009. “Prepared Remarks for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan at the National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference. [accessed June 1, 2010]. Available at http://www.hud.gov/news/speeches/2009-07-30.cfm.
    1. Fleischman S, Farnham T. “Chronic Disease in the Homeless.”. In: Wood D, editor. Delivering Health Care to Homeless Persons: The Diagnosis and Management of Medical and Mental Health Conditions. New York: Springer; 1992.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data