Genomic approaches to understanding Hox gene function
- PMID: 22099692
- DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386481-9.00003-1
Genomic approaches to understanding Hox gene function
Abstract
For many years, biologists have sought to understand how the homeodomain-containing transcriptional regulators encoded by Hox genes are able to control the development of animal morphology. Almost a century of genetics and several decades of molecular biology have defined the conserved organization of homeotic gene clusters in animals and the basic molecular properties of Hox transcription factors. In contrast to these successes, we remain relatively ignorant of how Hox proteins find their target genes in the genome or what sets of genes a Hox protein regulates to direct morphogenesis. The recent deployment of genomic methods, such as whole transcriptome mRNA expression profiling and genome-wide analysis of protein-DNA interactions, begins to shed light on these issues. Results from such studies, principally in the fruit fly, indicate that Hox proteins control the expression of hundreds, if not thousands, of genes throughout the gene regulatory network and that, in many cases, the effects on the expression of individual genes may be quite subtle. Hox proteins regulate both high-level effectors, including other transcription factors and signaling molecules, as well as the cytodifferentiation genes or Realizators at the bottom of regulatory hierarchies. Insights emerging from mapping Hox binding sites in the genome begin to suggest that Hox binding may be strongly influenced by chromatin accessibility rather than binding site affinity. If this is the case, it indicates we need to refocus our efforts at understanding Hox function toward the dynamics of gene regulatory networks and chromatin epigenetics.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age.Bioessays. 2008 Oct;30(10):965-79. doi: 10.1002/bies.20823. Bioessays. 2008. PMID: 18798525 Review.
-
Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila.Development. 2007 Jan;134(2):381-92. doi: 10.1242/dev.02746. Epub 2006 Dec 13. Development. 2007. PMID: 17166915
-
Drosophila Hox complex downstream targets and the function of homeotic genes.Bioessays. 1997 May;19(5):379-88. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190505. Bioessays. 1997. PMID: 9174403 Review.
-
Coordinated control of cell adhesion, polarity, and cytoskeleton underlies Hox-induced organogenesis in Drosophila.Curr Biol. 2006 Nov 21;16(22):2206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.029. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 17113384
-
Beyond homeosis--HOX function in morphogenesis and organogenesis.Differentiation. 2003 Oct;71(8):461-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.7108004.x. Differentiation. 2003. PMID: 14641327 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanisms Underlying Hox-Mediated Transcriptional Outcomes.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Nov 16;9:787339. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.787339. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34869389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular mapping and characterization of the silkworm apodal mutant.Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 7;6:18956. doi: 10.1038/srep18956. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26738847 Free PMC article.
-
Role of HOXA9 in leukemia: dysregulation, cofactors and essential targets.Oncogene. 2016 Mar 3;35(9):1090-8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.174. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Oncogene. 2016. PMID: 26028034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antennapedia is involved in the development of thoracic legs and segmentation in the silkworm, Bombyx mori.Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Sep;111(3):182-8. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.36. Epub 2013 May 8. Heredity (Edinb). 2013. PMID: 23652563 Free PMC article.
-
Conservation of transcription factor binding specificities across 600 million years of bilateria evolution.Elife. 2015 Mar 17;4:e04837. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04837. Elife. 2015. PMID: 25779349 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources