Mismatch-mediated error prone repair at the immunoglobulin genes
- PMID: 22100214
- PMCID: PMC3235044
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2011.09.001
Mismatch-mediated error prone repair at the immunoglobulin genes
Abstract
The generation of effective antibodies depends upon somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class-switch recombination (CSR) of antibody genes by activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and the subsequent recruitment of error prone base excision and mismatch repair. While AID initiates and is required for SHM, more than half of the base changes that accumulate in V regions are not due to the direct deamination of dC to dU by AID, but rather arise through the recruitment of the mismatch repair complex (MMR) to the U:G mismatch created by AID and the subsequent perversion of mismatch repair from a high fidelity process to one that is very error prone. In addition, the generation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential during CSR, and the resolution of AID-generated mismatches by MMR to promote such DSBs is critical for the efficiency of the process. While a great deal has been learned about how AID and MMR cause hypermutations and DSBs, it is still unclear how the error prone aspect of these processes is largely restricted to antibody genes. The use of knockout models and mice expressing mismatch repair proteins with separation-of-function point mutations have been decisive in gaining a better understanding of the roles of each of the major MMR proteins and providing further insight into how mutation and repair are coordinated. Here, we review the cascade of MMR factors and repair signals that are diverted from their canonical error free role and hijacked by B cells to promote genetic diversification of the Ig locus. This error prone process involves AID as the inducer of enzymatically-mediated DNA mismatches, and a plethora of downstream MMR factors acting as sensors, adaptors and effectors of a complex and tightly regulated process from much of which is not yet well understood.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Antibody diversification caused by disrupted mismatch repair and promiscuous DNA polymerases.DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Feb;38:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 2. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016. PMID: 26719140 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AIDing antibody diversity by error-prone mismatch repair.Semin Immunol. 2012 Aug;24(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Semin Immunol. 2012. PMID: 22703640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DNA polymerases β and λ do not directly affect Ig variable region somatic hypermutation although their absence reduces the frequency of mutations.DNA Repair (Amst). 2013 Dec;12(12):1087-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 29. DNA Repair (Amst). 2013. PMID: 24084171 Free PMC article.
-
UNG shapes the specificity of AID-induced somatic hypermutation.J Exp Med. 2012 Jul 2;209(7):1379-89. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112253. Epub 2012 Jun 4. J Exp Med. 2012. PMID: 22665573 Free PMC article.
-
Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in Msh6(-/-)Ung(-/-) double-knockout mice.J Immunol. 2006 Oct 15;177(8):5386-92. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5386. J Immunol. 2006. PMID: 17015724
Cited by
-
Antibody diversification caused by disrupted mismatch repair and promiscuous DNA polymerases.DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Feb;38:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 2. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016. PMID: 26719140 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-canonical actions of mismatch repair.DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Feb;38:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Dec 2. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016. PMID: 26698648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The dual nature of mismatch repair as antimutator and mutator: for better or for worse.Front Genet. 2014 Aug 21;5:287. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00287. eCollection 2014. Front Genet. 2014. PMID: 25191341 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Structural analysis of the activation-induced deoxycytidine deaminase required in immunoglobulin diversification.DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Jul;43:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 May 13. DNA Repair (Amst). 2016. PMID: 27258794 Free PMC article.
-
Stochastic Processes and Component Plasticity Governing DNA Mismatch Repair.J Mol Biol. 2018 Oct 26;430(22):4456-4468. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.039. Epub 2018 Jun 1. J Mol Biol. 2018. PMID: 29864444 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Marcon E, Moens PB. The evolution of meiosis: recruitment and modification of somatic DNA-repair proteins. BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2005;27:795–808. - PubMed
-
- Youds JL, Boulton SJ. The choice in meiosis - defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. Journal of cell science. 2011;124:501–513. - PubMed
-
- Andersen SL, Sekelsky J. Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes. BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2010;32:1058–1066. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pavri R, Nussenzweig MC. AID targeting in antibody diversity. Adv Immunol. 2011;110:1–26. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources