Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May;26(5):1231-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2041-2. Epub 2011 Nov 20.

Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: is it really more difficult for the novice?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: is it really more difficult for the novice?

S A F Fransen et al. Surg Endosc. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Single-incision laparoscopy is a step forward toward nearly scarless surgery. Concern has been raised that single-incision laparoscopy is technically more challenging than conventional laparoscopy. This study researched the performance curves of novice trainees for single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) versus conventional laparoscopy for performing two basic tasks on a box trainer.

Methods: In this study, 20 novice participants performed two tasks (peg transfer and a dissection task) on a standard box trainer. All the participants practiced each task 11 times and were randomized in two groups. The first group performed the tasks on a box trainer through three incisions. The second group used a single-incision access with the same box trainer. The assessment scores for errors and time were recorded. The 2nd, 8th, and 11th runs of both tasks in both settings were assessed to objectify the gain in basic laparoscopic skills.

Results: The performance curves for both groups improved significantly in terms of both time and errors in performing the two tasks [P < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. For the first task, no significant difference in time between the two groups was observed at the top of the performance curve (mean, 212 ± 64 vs. 182 ± 48 s), but the SILS group performed with fewer errors (1.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.7 ± 2.11). However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). The dissection task was performed faster in the SILS group (mean, 205 ± 78 vs. 243 ± 40 s; P = 0, 18) with fewer errors (0.7 ± 1.05 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1; P = 0. 12), but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: This study showed a significant improvement in basic skills for both the SILS and conventional laparoscopy settings after 11 repetitions. These data suggest that box training shows no significant difference between conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic settings in terms of error or time in performing basic tasks at a low complexity level for the novice. These data also show significant improvement in basic skills over a relatively short period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Setup box trainer: single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) setting
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box trainer: tasks 1 and 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Outline of the protocol
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Task 1. Peg transfer: time versus repetition
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Task 1. Peg transfer: errors versus repetition
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Task 2. Dissection: time versus repetition
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Task 2. Dissection: errors versus repetition

References

    1. Chamberlain RS, Sakpal SV. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1733–1740. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0902-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CD, Farrell TM. Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg. 2001;181:547–550. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00639-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallagher AG, Mc Clure N, Mc Guigan J, et al. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998;30:617–620. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001366. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:483–490. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1197-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:709–714. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources