Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost
- PMID: 22101420
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2047-9
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost
Abstract
Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been used for colorectal cancer as a minimally invasive procedure. However, there are still difficulties concerning effective triangulation and countertraction. The study's purpose was to clarify the usefulness of the colon-lifting technique (CLT) in SILS for colorectal cancer.
Methods: SILS was performed for cancer (cT2N0 or less) of the right-sided colon (near the ileocecum), sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. The SILS™ Port was used for transumbilical access. A suture string was inserted through the abdominal wall and passed through the mesocolon. The colon was retracted anteriorly and fixed to the abdominal wall. The main mesenteric vessels were placed under tension. Lymph node dissection was performed by medial approach. Short-term surgical outcomes and access port costs were compared between SILS (using CLT) and the standard multiport technique (MPT). The two groups were case-matched by propensity scoring. Analyzed variables included preoperative Dukes stage and tumor location.
Results: From June 2009 to April 2011, 27 patients underwent SILS, and from April 2005 to April 2011, 85 patients underwent MPT. Propensity scoring generated 23 matched patients per group for SILS versus MPT comparisons. There were no significant differences in operating time, blood loss, early complications, postoperative analgesic frequency, or length of hospital stay. One MPT patient was converted to open surgery (4.5%); no SILS patients were converted. There were no significant differences in the length of distal cut margin and the number of harvested lymph nodes, except incision length (SILS vs. MPT: 33 vs. 55 mm, P < 0.001). Significant differences favored SILS in access instrument cost (SILS vs. MPT: 62,761 vs. 77,130 Japanese yen, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: SILS performed using CLT was safe and effective in providing radical treatment of cT2N0 cancer in the right-sided colon, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. SILS was advantageous with respect to cosmesis and lower cost of access instruments.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by a colon lifting-up technique that decreases the number of access ports: comparison by propensity scoring of short-term and long-term outcomes with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ec97. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012. PMID: 22318058
-
A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26620555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1407-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03918-6. Epub 2021 Apr 7. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33829313
-
Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;16(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1521-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30414613 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 4;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1721-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31685027 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases.Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1317-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4371-y. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26139507
-
Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopy surgery versus conventional multi-port laparoscopy surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 29;39(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04630-x. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38684561 Free PMC article.
-
Z skin incision in reduced-port surgery for colorectal cancer.Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;4(4):611-615. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.757. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27073675 Free PMC article.
-
Single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery shows equivalent or better outcomes to standard laparoscopic surgery: results of a 190-patient, 7-criterion case-match study.Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1492-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3830-1. Epub 2014 Oct 3. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25277473
-
New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18104-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18104. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25561780 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous