Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr;21(3):405-15.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0065-7. Epub 2011 Nov 19.

Palliative care outcomes in surgical oncology patients with advanced malignancies: a mixed methods approach

Gwenyth R Wallen  1 , Karen Baker, Marilyn Stolar, Claiborne Miller-Davis, Nancy Ames, Jan Yates, Jacques Bolle, Donna Pereira, Diane St Germain, Daniel Handel, Ann Berger
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Palliative care outcomes in surgical oncology patients with advanced malignancies: a mixed methods approach

Gwenyth R Wallen et al. Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively compare outcomes and processes of hospital-based early palliative care with standard care in surgical oncology patients (N = 152).

Methods: A randomized, mixed methods, longitudinal study evaluated the effectiveness of a hospital-based Pain and Palliative Care Service (PPCS). Interviews were conducted presurgically and at follow-up visits up to 1 year. Primary outcome measures included the Gracely Pain Intensity and Unpleasantness Scales and the Symptom Distress Scale. Qualitative interviews assessed social support, satisfaction with care, and communication with providers. Survival analysis methods explored factors related to treatment crossover and study discontinuation. Models for repeated measures within subjects over time explored treatment and covariate effects on patient-reported pain and symptom distress.

Results: None of the estimated differences achieved statistical significance; however, for those who remained on study for 12 months, the PPCS group performed better than their standard of care counterparts. Patients identified consistent communication, emotional support, and pain and symptom management as positive contributions delivered by the PPCS.

Conclusions: It is unclear whether lower pain perceptions despite greater symptom distress were clinically meaningful; however, when coupled with the patients' perceptions of their increased resources and alternatives for pain control, one begins to see the value of an integrated PPCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean scores versus time
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnold BL. Mapping hospice patients” perception and verbal communication of end-of-life needs: An exploratory mixed methods inquiry. BMC Palliative Care. 2011;10(1):1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, Balan S, Brokaw FC, Seville J, et al. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;302(7):741–749. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrera M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1986;14(4):413–445.
    1. Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. Measuring quality of life: Are quality of life measures patient centered? British Medical Journal. 2001;322:1357–1360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleeland CS. Cross-cutting research issues: A research agenda for reducing distress of patients with cancer. In: Foley KM, Gellband H, editors. Improving palliative care for cancer. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. pp. 233–276.

Publication types

MeSH terms