Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000265.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000265. Print 2011.

Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations

Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Alison Rushton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy management in patients experiencing whiplash associated disorder II, on clinically relevant outcomes in the short and longer term. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data. A third reviewer mediated disagreement. Assessment of risk of bias was tabulated across included trials. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across trials with similar interventions. Meta-analyses compared effect sizes, with random effects as primary analyses. Data sources Predefined terms were employed to search electronic databases. Additional studies were identified from key journals, reference lists, authors and experts. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English before 31 December 2010 evaluating physiotherapy management of patients (>16 years), experiencing whiplash associated disorder II. Any physiotherapy intervention was included, when compared with other types of management, placebo/sham, or no intervention. Measurements reported on ≥1 outcome from the domains within the international classification of function, disability and health, were included. Results 21 RCTs (2126 participants, 9 countries) were included. Interventions were categorised as active physiotherapy or a specific physiotherapy intervention. 20/21 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias and one as unclear. 1395 participants were incorporated in the meta-analyses on 12 trials. In evaluating short term outcome in the acute/sub-acute stage, there was some evidence that active physiotherapy intervention reduces pain and improves range of movement, and that a specific physiotherapy intervention may reduce pain. However, moderate/considerable heterogeneity suggested that treatments may differ in nature or effect in different trial patients. Differences between participants, interventions and trial designs limited potential meta-analyses. Conclusions Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of physiotherapy management for whiplash associated disorder II. There is potential benefit for improving range of movement and pain short term through active physiotherapy, and for improving pain through a specific physiotherapy intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram (from Moher et al21). WAD, whiplash associated disorder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pain short-term.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROM (range of movement) flexion/extension short-term.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROM (range of movement) right side flexion/left side flexion short-term.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ROM (range of movement) rotation right/left short-term.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Disability short-term.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders: redefining ‘whiplash’ and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S–73S - PubMed
    1. Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in Whiplash associated disorders after traffic collisions, results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck pain and its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(4 Suppl):S52–9 - PubMed
    1. Jansen GB, Edlund C, Grane P, et al. ; The Swedish Society of Medicine and the Whiplash Commission Medical Task Force Whiplash injuries: diagnosis and early management. Eur Spine J 2008;17(Suppl 3):S359–418 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burton K. Treatment guidelines: is there a need? Proceedings of Whiplash Conference 2003, Bath, England, 6–8th May. Bristol: Lyons Davidson Solicitors, 2003
    1. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N. Whiplash injury: clinical review. Pain 1994;58:283–307 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources