Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2009 Winter;42(4):773-83.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-773.

A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior

Mark O'Reilly  1 , Russell Lang, Tonya Davis, Mandy Rispoli, Wendy Machalicek, Jeff Sigafoos, Giulio Lancioni, Robert Didden
Affiliations
Case Reports

A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior

Mark O'Reilly et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Winter.

Abstract

We examined the effects of three different presession conditions on tangibly maintained problem behavior for 2 students with autism, using individual-participant multielement designs. First, an analogue functional analysis demonstrated that problem behavior was maintained by access to tangible items. Next, topographies of item rejection were identified. Finally, students were exposed to (a) brief access, (b) no access, and (c) satiation to the tangible items prior to tangible sessions. The results demonstrated high levels of problem behavior following the brief-access and no-access presession conditions and low levels of problem behavior following the satiation condition. The findings are discussed in the context of how satiation might best be defined for these sorts of evaluations.

Keywords: deprivation; functional analysis; motivating operations; problem behavior; satiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of intervals with problem behavior during attention, demand, tangible, and play conditions for Rusty (top) and Terry (bottom).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of intervals with item rejection with high- and low-preference items for Rusty (top) and Terry (bottom).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of intervals with problem behavior during the tangible condition following no-access, brief-access, and satiation conditions for Rusty (top) and Terry (bottom).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ayllon T, Azrin N.H. Reinforcer sampling: A technique for increasing the behavior of mental patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1968;1:13–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azrin N.H, Powell J. Behavioral engineering: The use of response priming to improve prescribed self-medication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1969;2:39–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg W.K, Peck S, Wacker D.P, Harding J, McComas J, Richman D, et al. The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2000;30:463–477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carr E.G, Blakeley-Smith A. Classroom intervention for illness-related problem behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification. 2006;30:901–924. - PubMed
    1. Carr J.E, Bailey J.S, Ecott C.L, Lucker K.D, Weil T.M. On the effects of noncontingent delivery of differing magnitudes of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1998;31:313–321. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types