Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Nov 22:11:154.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-154.

A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales

Helen Christensen  1 , Philip J Batterham, Janie Busby Grant, Kathleen M Griffiths, Andrew J Mackinnon
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales

Helen Christensen et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Screening instruments for mental disorders need to be short, engaging, and valid. Current screening instruments are usually questionnaire-based and may be opaque to the user. A prototype approach where individuals identify with a description of an individual with typical symptoms of depression, anxiety, social phobia or panic may be a shorter, faster and more acceptable method for screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of four new prototype screeners for predicting depression and anxiety disorders and to compare their performance with existing scales.

Methods: Short and ultra-short prototypes were developed for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder (PD) and Social Phobia (SP). Prototypes were compared to typical short and ultra-short self-report screening scales, such as the Centre for Epidemiology Scale, CES-D and the GAD-7, and their short forms. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) version 6 1 was used as the gold standard for obtaining clinical criteria through a telephone interview. From a population sample, 225 individuals who endorsed a prototype and 101 who did not were administered the MINI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the short and ultra short prototypes and for the short and ultra short screening scales.

Results: The study found that the rates of endorsement of the prototypes were commensurate with prevalence estimates. The short-form and ultra short scales outperformed the short and ultra short prototypes for every disorder except GAD, where the GAD prototype outperformed the GAD 7.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that people may be able to self-identify generalised anxiety more accurately than depression based on a description of a prototypical case. However, levels of identification were lower than expected. Considerable benefits from this method of screening may ensue if our prototypes can be improved for Major Depressive Disorder, Social Phobia and Panic Disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sampling procedure and response rates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rates of prototype endorsement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves for the prototypes, short-form prototypes, scales and short-form scales for depression, GAD, social phobia and panic disorder.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sheehan D, Janavs J, Harnett-Sheehan K, Sheehan M, Gray C, Lecrubier Y, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Allgulander C, Kadri N, Baldwin D, Even C. M.I.N.I.: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, English version 6.0.0 (DSM-IV) 2009.
    1. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Smits N, Smit F. Screening and early psychological intervention for depression in schools: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;15(5):300–307. doi: 10.1007/s00787-006-0537-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbody S, Sheldon T, Wessely S. Should we screen for depression? BMJ. 2006;332(7548):1027–1030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katon W, Roy-Byrne P. Anxiety disorders: efficient screening is the first step in improving outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(5):390–392. - PubMed
    1. Gilbody S, Sheldon T, House A. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(8):997–1003. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types