Pedicle-screw-based dynamic implants may increase posterior intervertebral disc bulging during flexion
- PMID: 22103650
- DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2011.023
Pedicle-screw-based dynamic implants may increase posterior intervertebral disc bulging during flexion
Abstract
Abstract Posterior disc bulging may lead to nerve root compression and radicular pain, and in extreme cases to a local pressure on the dural sac and thus to back pain. Compared to when standing, posterior disc bulging is increased during extension and decreased during flexion, in an uninstrumented spine. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a pedicle-screw-based dynamic implant on posterior disc bulging. A finite element model of the lumbosacral spine was used to calculate posterior disc bulging before and after implantation of a dynamic implant for different loading cases. The elastic modulus of the longitudinal rod was varied, and the influence of distraction of the bridged segment on disc bulging was also determined. In addition, the centre of rotation (CoR) was determined. Due to a dynamic implant, the magnitude of posterior disc bulging was reduced compared to that for "standing without an implant" during extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. During flexion, however, disc bulging was usually increased. With increasing stiffness of the dynamic implant, the CoR moved towards the longitudinal rod. This posterior shift of the CoR led to a compression of the entire intervertebral disc during flexion and thus to an increase of disc bulging.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug;16(8):1223-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0292-8. Epub 2007 Jan 6. Eur Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17206401 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):2963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 8. J Biomech. 2010. PMID: 20696430
-
Posterior motion preserving implants evaluated by means of intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber strains.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Mar;27(3):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 8. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012. PMID: 21983522
-
Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration.Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S354-60. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0176-y. Epub 2006 Jul 12. Eur Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16835733 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Biomechanics of lumbar instability].Orthopade. 1997 Jun;26(6):516-20. doi: 10.1007/PL00003406. Orthopade. 1997. PMID: 9333739 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?World J Clin Cases. 2013 Jul 16;1(4):134-9. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i4.134. World J Clin Cases. 2013. PMID: 24303484 Free PMC article.
-
Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.Bone Joint Res. 2018 Sep 15;7(8):524-538. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.78.BJR-2018-0025.R1. eCollection 2018 Aug. Bone Joint Res. 2018. PMID: 30258572 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical