Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Dec;118(6):1287-1292.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236f7ed.

Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia

Josien P M Penninx et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the results of a previous study comparing bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for the treatment of menorrhagia at 5-year follow-up.

Method: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between March 2005 and August 2007. One-hundred sixty women with menorrhagia were randomly allocated to bipolar ablation or hydrothermablation. The results of follow-up at 12 months were previously reported. At 4-5 years of follow-up, a questionnaire was sent to all the participants to register amenorrhea rates, reinterventions, and patient satisfaction.

Results: At 5-year follow-up, response rates were 90% and 83% in the bipolar group and hydrotherm group, respectively. Amenorrhea rates were 55.4% and 35.3% in the bipolar group and the hydrotherm group, respectively (relative risk [RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.3). The number of surgical reinterventions was 11 compared with 23 (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.80). Overall, more women were satisfied in the bipolar group compared with the hydrotherm group.

Conclusion: After treatment, bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation system is more effective at 5 years than hydrothermablation in the treatment of menorrhagia.

Level of evidence: II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract 2004;54:359–63.
    1. Palep-Singh M, Prentic A. Epidemiology of abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21:887.
    1. Roberts TE, Tsourapas A, Middleton LJ, Champaniera R, Daniels JP, Cooper KG, et al.. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011;342:d2202.
    1. Abbott JA, Garry R. The surgical management of menorrhagia. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:68–78.
    1. Nagele F, Rubinger T, Magos A. Why do women choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy? Fertil Steril 1998;69:1063–6.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources