Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia
- PMID: 22105257
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236f7ed
Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of a previous study comparing bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for the treatment of menorrhagia at 5-year follow-up.
Method: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between March 2005 and August 2007. One-hundred sixty women with menorrhagia were randomly allocated to bipolar ablation or hydrothermablation. The results of follow-up at 12 months were previously reported. At 4-5 years of follow-up, a questionnaire was sent to all the participants to register amenorrhea rates, reinterventions, and patient satisfaction.
Results: At 5-year follow-up, response rates were 90% and 83% in the bipolar group and hydrotherm group, respectively. Amenorrhea rates were 55.4% and 35.3% in the bipolar group and the hydrotherm group, respectively (relative risk [RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.3). The number of surgical reinterventions was 11 compared with 23 (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.80). Overall, more women were satisfied in the bipolar group compared with the hydrotherm group.
Conclusion: After treatment, bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation system is more effective at 5 years than hydrothermablation in the treatment of menorrhagia.
Level of evidence: II.
Comment in
-
Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):179; author reply 179. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825d68fe. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22914409 No abstract available.
References
-
- Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract 2004;54:359–63.
-
- Palep-Singh M, Prentic A. Epidemiology of abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21:887.
-
- Roberts TE, Tsourapas A, Middleton LJ, Champaniera R, Daniels JP, Cooper KG, et al.. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011;342:d2202.
-
- Abbott JA, Garry R. The surgical management of menorrhagia. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:68–78.
-
- Nagele F, Rubinger T, Magos A. Why do women choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy? Fertil Steril 1998;69:1063–6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
