Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr;13(2):150-61.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0259-9.

Cost-benefit analysis of communities that care outcomes at eighth grade

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-benefit analysis of communities that care outcomes at eighth grade

Margaret R Kuklinski et al. Prev Sci. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system, a public health approach to reducing risk, enhancing protection, and reducing the prevalence of adolescent health and behavior problems community wide. The analysis is based on outcomes from a panel of students followed from Grade 5 through Grade 8 in a randomized controlled trial involving 24 communities in 7 states. Previous analyses have shown that CTC prevented the initiation of cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and delinquency by the end of 8th grade in CTC communities compared to controls. This paper estimates long-term monetary benefits associated with significant intervention effects on cigarette smoking and delinquency as compared to the cost of conducting the intervention. Under conservative cost assumptions, the net present benefit is $5,250 per youth, including $812 from the prevention of cigarette smoking and $4,438 from the prevention of delinquency. The benefit-cost ratio indicates a return of $5.30 per $1.00 invested. Under less conservative but still viable cost assumptions, the benefit-cost ratio due to prevention of cigarette smoking and delinquency increases to $10.23 per $1.00 invested. Benefits from CTC's reduction in alcohol initiation as well as broader inclusion of quality-of-life gains would further increase CTC's benefit-cost ratio. Results provide evidence that CTC is a cost-beneficial preventive intervention and a good investment of public dollars, even under very conservative cost and benefit assumptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relationship between CTC cost per youth (discounted 2004 dollars) and youth population.

References

    1. Aos S, Lieb R, Mayfield J, Miller M, Pennucci A. Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth (Publication No. 04-07-3901) Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2004.
    1. Barnett WS. Economic evaluation of home visiting programs. The Future of Children. 1993;3:93–112.
    1. Barnett WS, Masse LN. Comparative benefit–cost analysis of the Abecedarian Program and its policy implications. Economics of Education Review. 2007;26:113–125.
    1. Belfield CR, Nores M, Barnett S, Schweinhart L. The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost–benefit analysis using data from the age-40 followup. Journal of Human Resources. 2006;XLI:162–190.
    1. Breslau N, Peterson EL. Smoking cessation in young adults: Age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86:214–220. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources