Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:487025.
doi: 10.1155/2011/487025. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Cost of illness for patients with arthritis receiving multidisciplinary rehabilitation care

Affiliations

Cost of illness for patients with arthritis receiving multidisciplinary rehabilitation care

Margreth Grotle et al. Rehabil Res Pract. 2011.

Abstract

Purpose. To describe healthcare consumption and costs prior to, during, and after multidisciplinary rehabilitation due to arthritis. Methods. 306 patients (age 18-75 years) with arthritis scheduled for multidisciplinary rehabilitation care in 9 rehabilitation centres and 4 rheumatology hospital departments were included and followed for 6 months. Costs were estimated in Euros (€) for the total sample and five clinical subgroups. Results. Healthcare costs ranged from €3,033 to €91,336 and were significantly higher at hospital departments compared to rehabilitation centres: €9,722 (SD 5,406) and €4,250 (SD 1,040). While total costs prior to and after rehabilitation were stable for those receiving rehabilitation at a hospital, there was a significant increase in costs for those being at a rehabilitation centre. Total mean costs were more than doubled when including social costs: from €32,410 (95% CI 20,074-37,017) to €51,491 (95% CI 49,055-61,657). Conclusions. Healthcare and social costs for arthritis rehabilitation were substantial both before and after a rehabilitation stay. It is important to explore methods to reduce the length of rehabilitation stay and production loss connected to rehabilitation of patients with rheumatic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vliet Vlieland TPM, de Buck PDM, van den Hout WB. Vocational rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic arthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2009;21(2):183–188. - PubMed
    1. Holte HH, Tambs K, Bjerkedal T. Time trends in disability pensioning for rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and soft tissue rheumatism in Norway 1968–97. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2003;31(1):17–23. - PubMed
    1. Lambert CM, Hurst NP, Forbes JF, Lochhead A, Macleod M, Nuki G. Is day care equivalent to inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis? Randomised controlled clinical and economic evaluation. British Medical Journal. 1998;316(7136):965–969. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Hout WB, Tijhuis GJ, Hazes JMW, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of multidisciplinary care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised comparison of clinical nurse specialist care, inpatient team care, and day patient team care. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2003;62(4):308–315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vliet Vlieland TPM. Multidisciplinary team care and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2004;16(2):153–156. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources