Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:590780.
doi: 10.1155/2011/590780. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

Validation of a biofeedback system for wheelchair propulsion training

Affiliations

Validation of a biofeedback system for wheelchair propulsion training

Liyun Guo et al. Rehabil Res Pract. 2011.

Abstract

This paper describes the design and validation of the OptiPush Biofeedback System, a commercially available, instrumented wheel system that records handrim biomechanics and provides stroke-by-stroke biofeedback and targeting for 11 propulsion variables. Testing of the system revealed accurate measurement of wheel angle (0.02% error), wheel speed (0.06% error), and handrim loads. The maximum errors in static force and torque measurements were 3.80% and 2.05%, respectively. Measured forces were also found to be highly linear (0.985 < slope < 1.011) and highly correlated to the reference forces (r(2) > .998). Dynamic measurements of planar forces (F(x) and F(y)) and axle torque also had low error (-0.96 N to 0.83 N for force and 0.10 Nm to 0.14 Nm for torque) and were highly correlated (r > .986) with expected force and torque values. Overall, the OptiPush Biofeedback System provides accurate measurement of wheel dynamics and handrim biomechanics and may be a useful tool for improving manual wheelchair propulsion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The components (a) and assembly (b) of the OptiPush wheel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Definition of the stroke cycle, push phase, and coast phase.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of the push-by-push biofeedback display.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Centrifugal force (F C) and gravitation (F G) force of the test mass applied to the handrim during dynamic testing, where θ is the wheel angle, ω is the angular velocity of the wheel, r is the radius of the handrim, and α is the angle of the mass with respect to the load cell coordinate system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolfe GA, Waters R, Hislop HJ. Influence of floor surface on the energy cost of wheelchair propulsion. Physical Therapy. 1977;57(9):1022–1027. - PubMed
    1. Hildebrandt G, Voigt ED, Bahn D, Berendes B, Kroger J. Energy cost of propelling a wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and the affect of steering accuracy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1970;51(3):131–136. - PubMed
    1. Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Laubach LL, Suryaprasad AG. Metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to wheelchair and bicycle ergometry. Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology. 1979;46(6):1066–1070. - PubMed
    1. Brubaker CE, Ross S. Static and dynamic comparisons of selected handrims for wheelchair propulsion. In: Stamp W, McLaurin CA, editors. Wheelchair Mobility 1976–1981. Rehabilitation Engineering Center, University of Virginia; 1976. pp. 28–31.
    1. van der Woude LHV, Veeger HEJ, Rozendal RH. Propulsion technique in hand rim wheelchair ambulation. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology. 1989;13(1-2):136–141. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources