Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;13(6):223.
doi: 10.1186/bcr2942. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects

Affiliations
Review

Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects

Norman F Boyd et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2011.

Abstract

Variations in percent mammographic density (PMD) reflect variations in the amounts of collagen and number of epithelial and non-epithelial cells in the breast. Extensive PMD is associated with a markedly increased risk of invasive breast cancer. The PMD phenotype is important in the context of breast cancer prevention because extensive PMD is common in the population, is strongly associated with risk of the disease, and, unlike most breast cancer risk factors, can be changed. Work now in progress makes it likely that measurement of PMD will be improved in the near future and that understanding of the genetics and biological basis of the association of PMD with breast cancer risk will also improve. Future prospects for the application of PMD include mammographic screening, risk prediction in individuals, breast cancer prevention research, and clinical decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of mammographic density. (a) 0% mammographic density, (b) less than 10%, (c) less than 25%, (d) less than 50%, (e) less than 75%, and (f) greater than 75%. On the right is an illustration of Cumulus in the measurement of mammographic density. The red line outlines the breast, and the green line outlines the area of density. Republished with permission from [2].

References

    1. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159–1169. - PubMed
    1. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill MJ, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–1237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johns PC, Yaffe MJ. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1987;32:675–695. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer. 1976;37:2486–2492. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:1130–1139. - PubMed

Publication types