Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study
- PMID: 22120767
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2411-1
Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study
Abstract
Purpose: Consent for research participation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often obtained from a substitute decision maker (SDM). In this study we explored SDMs' reasons for declining or providing consent for research studies for critically ill adult family members.
Methods: Two questionnaires were developed, one directed at SDMs who agreed to have their relative participate in a research study (AGREE group), and another for SDMs who declined participation (DECLINE group). The questionnaires explored SDMs' opinions about research in general, timing of research approach, the informed consent process, and reasons for agreeing or declining participation.
Results: Ninety-six SDMs completed the questionnaire (68 AGREE, 27 DECLINE). There were no differences between AGREE and DECLINE groups with respect to SDM demographics, perceived severity of illness of the patient, or the research study approach. The most common reasons for providing consent were potential for research to help others (91%), research is important for medical progress (88%), and trust in the medical team (87%). The most common reasons for declining consent were SDM was too anxious to consider research (67%), fear that patient would receive experimental treatment (37%), and concern about risks of the study (33%).
Conclusions: SDMs who agree to have a relative participate in an ICU research study are motivated by the potential benefit to the patient and altruism. SDMs who decline research participation, while not generally opposed to research, are fearful of study-related harm or discomfort for the patient, and are too anxious to consider a research study at that time.
Comment in
-
Considering the vulnerabilities of surrogate decision-makers when obtaining consent for critical care research.Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jan;38(1):4-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2430-y. Epub 2011 Nov 26. Intensive Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22120772 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):238-245. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-425OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. PMID: 27849142
-
Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan;41(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3558-3. Epub 2014 Dec 10. Intensive Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25491659 Clinical Trial.
-
Co-designing and pilot-testing an infographic to support the consent process in an adaptive platform trial for adults in ICU with community-acquired pneumonia or COVID-19: a mixed methods study within a trial (SWAT).Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 25;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00705-3. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40281565 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7229. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31322688 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):317-327. doi: 10.1071/AH20070. Aust Health Rev. 2021. PMID: 33472740
Cited by
-
Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: tensions between theory and practice.Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3243-6. Epub 2014 Feb 26. Intensive Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24570266 Review.
-
Advances and challenges in conducting ethical trials involving populations lacking capacity to consent: A decade in review.Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106054. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106054. Epub 2020 Jun 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32526281 Free PMC article.
-
Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1185-1190. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202007-851OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021. PMID: 33529538 Free PMC article.
-
Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients.Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2625-x. Epub 2012 Jul 24. Intensive Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22825282
-
Deferred consent in a minimal-risk study involving critically ill subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.Can Respir J. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):293-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/719270. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Can Respir J. 2014. PMID: 24914705 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources