Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;73(5):674-84.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04153.x.

Using text-mining techniques in electronic patient records to identify ADRs from medicine use

Affiliations
Review

Using text-mining techniques in electronic patient records to identify ADRs from medicine use

Pernille Warrer et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May.

Abstract

This literature review included studies that use text-mining techniques in narrative documents stored in electronic patient records (EPRs) to investigate ADRs. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts without restrictions from origin until July 2011. We included empirically based studies on text mining of electronic patient records (EPRs) that focused on detecting ADRs, excluding those that investigated adverse events not related to medicine use. We extracted information on study populations, EPR data sources, frequencies and types of the identified ADRs, medicines associated with ADRs, text-mining algorithms used and their performance. Seven studies, all from the United States, were eligible for inclusion in the review. Studies were published from 2001, the majority between 2009 and 2010. Text-mining techniques varied over time from simple free text searching of outpatient visit notes and inpatient discharge summaries to more advanced techniques involving natural language processing (NLP) of inpatient discharge summaries. Performance appeared to increase with the use of NLP, although many ADRs were still missed. Due to differences in study design and populations, various types of ADRs were identified and thus we could not make comparisons across studies. The review underscores the feasibility and potential of text mining to investigate narrative documents in EPRs for ADRs. However, more empirical studies are needed to evaluate whether text mining of EPRs can be used systematically to collect new information about ADRs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of selection and review process for included/excluded articles

References

    1. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, Farrar K, Park BK, Breckenridge AM. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18.820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329:15–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel P, Zed PJ. Drug-related visits to the emergency department: how big is the problem? Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22:915–23. - PubMed
    1. Wester K, Jonsson AK, Spigset O, Druid H, Hagg S. Incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions: a population based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65:573–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen EH, Launsø L. Is the controlled clinical trial sufficient as a drug technology assessment? J Soc Adm Pharm. 1989;6:117–26.
    1. Stricker BH, Psaty BM. Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reaction. BMJ. 2004;3:44–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms