A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories
- PMID: 22122114
- DOI: 10.1037/a0026240
A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories
Abstract
In this article we report on listener categorization of meaningful environmental sounds. A starting point for this study was the phenomenological taxonomy proposed by Gaver (1993b). In the first experimental study, 15 participants classified 60 environmental sounds and indicated the properties shared by the sounds in each class. In a second experimental study, 30 participants classified and described 56 sounds exclusively made by solid objects. The participants were required to concentrate on the actions causing the sounds independent of the sound source. The classifications were analyzed with a specific hierarchical cluster technique that accounted for possible cross-classifications, and the verbalizations were submitted to statistical lexical analyses. The results of the first study highlighted 4 main categories of sounds: solids, liquids, gases, and machines. The results of the second study indicated a distinction between discrete interactions (e.g., impacts) and continuous interactions (e.g., tearing) and suggested that actions and objects were not independent organizational principles. We propose a general structure of environmental sound categorization based on the sounds' temporal patterning, which has practical implications for the automatic classification of environmental sounds.
PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Listener expertise and sound identification influence the categorization of environmental sounds.J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Mar;16(1):16-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018762. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010. PMID: 20350041
-
Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):401-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0cf1. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18344871
-
Cortical networks representing object categories and high-level attributes of familiar real-world action sounds.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):2079-101. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21570. Epub 2010 Sep 2. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20812786
-
General functions and specific applications of environmental sound research.Front Biosci. 2007 May 1;12:3152-66. doi: 10.2741/2303. Front Biosci. 2007. PMID: 17485290 Review.
-
Sound perception in plants.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Aug;92:134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 27. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019. PMID: 30965110 Review.
Cited by
-
Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 17;23(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05503-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35715757 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Egocentric Nature of Action-Sound Associations.Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26941686 Free PMC article.
-
Rising tones and rustling noises: Metaphors in gestural depictions of sounds.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181786. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28750071 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates.Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e964-e971. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002006. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 30252797 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of everyday sounds: a developmental study of a free sorting task.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 2;10(2):e0115557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115557. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25643286 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources