Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Sep;50(1-2):129-40.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9482-6.

Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods

Jeannette O Andrews et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

African American women in urban, high poverty neighborhoods have high rates of smoking, difficulties with quitting, and disproportionate tobacco-related health disparities. Prior research utilizing conventional "outsider driven" interventions targeted to individuals has failed to show effective cessation outcomes. This paper describes the application of a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework to inform a culturally situated, ecological based, multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods. The CBPR framework encompasses problem identification, planning and feasibility/pilot testing, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination. There have been multiple partners in this process including public housing residents, housing authority administrators, community health workers, tenant associations, and academic investigators. The advisory process has evolved from an initial small steering group to our current institutional community advisory boards. Our decade-long CBPR journey produced design innovations, promising preliminary outcomes, and a full-scaled implementation study in two states. Challenges include sustaining engagement with evolving study partners, maintaining equity and power in the partnerships, and long-term sustainability of the intervention. Implications include applicability of the framework with other CBPR partnerships, especially scaling up evolutionary grassroots involvement to multi-regional partnerships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CBPR framework to inform RCT
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Guiding social ecological model for multi-level smoking cessation intervention (Sister to Sister)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahluwalia J, Okuyemi K, Nollen N, Choi W, Kaur H, Pulvers K, et al. The effects of nicotine gum and counseling among African American light smokers: A 2 × 2 factorial design. Addiction. 2006;101:883–891. - PubMed
    1. Andrews JO. Sister to Sister: A community partnered tobacco cessation intervention in low-income housing developments. Dissertation Abstracts International. 2004;65 (2004:UMI No. 3157115)
    1. Andrews JO, Bentley G, Crawford S, Pretlow L, Tingen M. Using community based participatory research to develop a culturally sensitive smoking cessation intervention with public housing neighborhoods. Ethnicity and Disease. 2007a;17:331–337. - PubMed
    1. Andrews JO, Cox MJ, Newman SD, Meadows O. The design and initial evaluation of a toolkit to assess partnership readiness for CBPR. Progress in Community Health Partnerships. 2011;52:183–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews JO, Felton G, Wewers ME, Heath J. Use of community health workers in research with ethnic minority women. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2004;36(4):358–365. - PubMed

Publication types