Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug;28(6):1499-511.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9982-3. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Endocardial and epicardial myocardial perfusion determined by semi-quantitative and quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Endocardial and epicardial myocardial perfusion determined by semi-quantitative and quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance

Abdulghani Larghat et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

This study aims to quantify subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and to compare semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis methods. 17 healthy volunteers (9 males, mean age 34 ± 8) were scanned during adenosine stress and at rest. A "semi-quantitative" myocardial perfusion index (MPI) was calculated based on maximal upslopes of signal intensity-time profiles for a mid-ventricular myocardial slice. In addition, absolute MBF (ml/g/min) was estimated using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. On semi-quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MPI was 0.98 ± 0.1 at stress and 1.16 ± 0.09 at rest, P < 0.0001. The MPRI (i.e. the ratio of stress over rest MPI) for the subendocardium was 1.54 ± 0.3 versus 1.81 ± 0.35 for the subepicardium, P = 0.03. For quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MBF was 0.91 ± 0.11 at stress versus 1.17 ± 0.16 at rest, P < 0.0001. The subendocardial MBF reserve was also lower than in the subepicardium (2.6 ± 0.75 vs. 3.32 ± 0.93, P = 0.027). In conclusion, semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI shows higher subendocardial blood flow at rest and reduced subendocardial perfusion reserve compared to the subepicardium.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(5):953-63 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6(2):499-507 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1975 Jan;55(1):43-9 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2005 Nov;40(11):715-24 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2004 Jul 6;110(1):58-65 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources