Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Dec 28;52(13):9658-64.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8559.

ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening

Gui-shuang Ying et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate, by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the accuracy of three instruments of refractive error in detecting eye conditions among 3- to 5-year-old Head Start preschoolers and to evaluate differences in accuracy between instruments and screeners and by age of the child.

Methods: Children participating in the Vision In Preschoolers (VIP) Study (n = 4040), had screening tests administered by pediatric eye care providers (phase I) or by both nurse and lay screeners (phase II). Noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and the SureSight Vision Screener (SureSight, Alpharetta, GA) were used in phase I, and Retinomax and SureSight were used in phase II. Pediatric eye care providers performed a standardized eye examination to identify amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and reduced visual acuity. The accuracy of the screening tests was summarized by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and compared between instruments and screeners and by age group.

Results: The three screening tests had a high AUC for all categories of screening personnel. The AUC for detecting any VIP-targeted condition was 0.83 for NCR, 0.83 (phase I) to 0.88 (phase II) for Retinomax, and 0.86 (phase I) to 0.87 (phase II) for SureSight. The AUC was 0.93 to 0.95 for detecting group 1 (most severe) conditions and did not differ between instruments or screeners or by age of the child.

Conclusions: NCR, Retinomax, and SureSight had similar and high accuracy in detecting vision disorders in preschoolers across all types of screeners and age of child, consistent with previously reported results at specificity levels of 90% and 94%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ROC curves for detecting any VIP-targeted condition in phase I, year 1 (A) and in phase I, year 2 (B).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC curves for detecting VIP group 1 conditions in phase I, year 1 (A) and in phase I, year 2 (B).

References

    1. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:637–650 - PubMed
    1. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group Sensitivity of screening tests for detecting vision in preschoolers-targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:432–438 - PubMed
    1. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared to lay screeners in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2639–2648 - PubMed
    1. Arnold RW. Vision in Preschoolers Study (letter). Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2313. - PubMed
    1. Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group Reply to: Vision in Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2313

Publication types