Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;77(10):1364-7.

Is the Oncotype DX assay necessary in strongly estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers?

Affiliations
  • PMID: 22127090
Comparative Study

Is the Oncotype DX assay necessary in strongly estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers?

Jenny J Lee et al. Am Surg. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

The 21-gene Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies risk of distant recurrence and predicts benefit from chemotherapy in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, node-negative breast cancer. Although clinically useful, the assay costs roughly $4650. Because the assay is weighted heavily towards expression of ER, our objective was to determine its clinical utility in strongly ER-positive tumors. This was a retrospective study of Huntington Hospital patients undergoing an Oncotype DX assay between 2007 and 2010. Data collected included patient age, expression of ER, progesterone receptor (PR), HER2/neu, ki67, and p53, tumor size, node status, lymphovascular invasion, and nuclear grade. Of 133 total patients, 84 (63.2%) had strongly ER-positive tumors (≥90% expression). Only seven of 84 patients (8.3%) had a high risk RS (>30), indicating statistically significant predicted benefit from chemotherapy. All seven had intermediate to high ki67 expression (>20%) and lower PR expression (≤50%). Our study demonstrates that the clinical utility of the Oncotype DX assay in these patients is limited as most patients with strongly ER-positive tumors will have a low or intermediate RS. Future studies are needed to identify additional predictive factors in these patients with otherwise good prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms