Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;38(1):145-52.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2405-z. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

Impact of an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices in the intensive care unit

J P Quenot  1 , J P Rigaud, S Prin, S Barbar, A Pavon, M Hamet, N Jacquiot, B Blettery, C Hervé, P E Charles, G Moutel
Affiliations

Impact of an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices in the intensive care unit

J P Quenot et al. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Since the 2005 French law on end of life and patients' rights, it is unclear whether practices have evolved. We investigated whether an intensive communication strategy based on this law would influence practices in terms of withholding and withdrawing treatment (WWT), and outcome of patients hospitalised in intensive care (ICU).

Methods: This was a single-centre, two-period study performed before and after the 2005 law. Between these periods, an intensive strategy for communication was developed and implemented, comprising regular meetings and modalities for WWT. We examined medical records of all patients who died in the ICU or in hospital during both periods.

Results: In total, out of 2,478 patients admitted in period 1, 678 (27%) died in the ICU and 823/2,940 (28%) in period 2. In period 1, among patients who died in the ICU, 45% died subsequent to a decision to WWT versus 85% in period 2 (p < 0.01). Among these, median time delay between ICU admission and initiation of decision-making process was significantly different (6-7 days in period 1 vs. 3-5 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Similarly, median time from admission to actual WWT decision was significantly shorter in period 2 (11-13 days in period 1 vs. 4-6 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Finally, median time from admission to death in the ICU subsequent to a decision to WWT was 13-15 days in period 1 versus 7-8 days in period 2, p < 0.05. Reasons for WWT were not significantly different between periods.

Conclusion: Intensive communication brings about quicker end-of-life decision-making in the ICU. The new law has the advantage of providing a legal framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. French LATAREA Group. Lancet. 2001;357:9–14. - PubMed
    1. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:15–20. - PubMed
    1. Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen NH, Lo B, Cooke M, Schecter WP, Fink C, Epstein-Jaffe E, May C, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:309–315. - PubMed
    1. Rapin M, Le Gall JR. Palliative comfort therapy in critically ill patients. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1979;163:566–571. discussion 571. - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA, Rauss A, Alperovitch A, Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Patois E, Marcus SE. Do objective estimates of chances for survival influence decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment? The French Multicentric Group of ICU Research. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:163–171. - PubMed