Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;41(12):1516-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2222-0. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

Coronary imaging techniques with emphasis on CT and MRI

Affiliations
Review

Coronary imaging techniques with emphasis on CT and MRI

Mathieu Lederlin et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Coronary artery imaging in children is challenging, with high demands both on temporal and spatial resolution due to high heart rates and smaller anatomy. Although invasive conventional coronary angiography remains the benchmark technique, over the past 10 years, CT and MRI have emerged in the field of coronary imaging. The choice of hardware is important. For CT, the minimum requirement is a 64-channel scanner. The temporal resolution of the scanner is most important for optimising image quality and minimising radiation dose. Manufacturers have developed several modes of electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering to facilitate dose reduction. Recent technical advances have opened new possibilities in MRI coronary imaging. As a non-ionising radiation technique, MRI is of great interest in paediatric imaging. It is currently recommended in centres with appropriate expertise for the screening of patients with suspected congenital coronary anomalies. However, MRI is still not feasible in infants. This review describes and discusses the technical requirements and the pros and cons of all three techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Imaging of congenital coronary artery anomalies.
    Walsh R, Nielsen JC, Ko HH, Sanz J, Srivastava S, Parness IA, Lytrivi ID. Walsh R, et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Dec;41(12):1526-35. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2256-3. Epub 2011 Nov 30. Pediatr Radiol. 2011. PMID: 22127684 Review.
  • Coronary artery anomalies.
    Earls JP. Earls JP. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Dec;9(4):210-7. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2007.03.007. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006. PMID: 17709086 Review.
  • Coronary artery anomalies diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography.
    Welker M, Salanitri J, Deshpande VS, Shea SM, Li D, Pereles FS. Welker M, et al. Australas Radiol. 2006 Apr;50(2):114-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01541.x. Australas Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16635028 Review.
  • Coronary artery imaging in children.
    Goo HW. Goo HW. Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):239-50. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.239. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Korean J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25741188 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Coronary artery anatomy and variants.
    Malagò R, Pezzato A, Barbiani C, Alfonsi U, Nicolì L, Caliari G, Pozzi Mucelli R. Malagò R, et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Dec;41(12):1505-15. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2218-9. Epub 2011 Nov 30. Pediatr Radiol. 2011. PMID: 22127682 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 1999 Aug;212(2):579-87 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):W534-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1124-31 - PubMed
    1. Heart. 2007 Aug;93(8):908-13 - PubMed
    1. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Jan 7;47(1):107-15 - PubMed

MeSH terms