Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;16(12):1800-5.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0252. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Patient-centered cancer treatment planning: improving the quality of oncology care. Summary of an Institute of Medicine workshop

Affiliations

Patient-centered cancer treatment planning: improving the quality of oncology care. Summary of an Institute of Medicine workshop

Erin P Balogh et al. Oncologist. 2011.

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine's National Cancer Policy Forum recently convened a workshop on patient-centered cancer treatment planning, with the aim of raising awareness about this important but often overlooked aspect of cancer treatment. A primary goal of patient-centered treatment planning is to engage patients and their families in meaningful, thorough interactions with their health care providers to develop an accurate, well-conceived treatment plan, using all available medical information appropriately while also considering the medical, social, and cultural needs and desires of the patient and family. A cancer treatment plan can be shared among the patient, family, and care team in order to facilitate care coordination and provide a roadmap to help patients navigate the path of cancer treatment. There are numerous obstacles to achieving patient-centered cancer treatment planning in practice. Some of these challenges stem from the patient and include patients' lack of assertiveness, health literacy, and numeracy, and their emotional state and concurrent illnesses. Others are a result of physician limitations, such as a lack of time to explain complex information and a lack of tools to facilitate treatment planning, as well as insensitivity to patients' informational, cultural, and emotional needs. Potential solutions to address these obstacles include better training of health care providers and patients in optimal communication and shared decision making, and greater use of support services and tools such as patient navigation and electronic health records. Other options include greater use of quality metrics and reimbursement for the time it takes to develop, discuss, and document a treatment plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Erin P. Balogh: None; Patricia A. Ganz: None; Sharon B. Murphy: None; Sharyl J. Nass: None; Betty R. Ferrell: None; Ellen Stovall: Institute of Medicine (E).

Comment in

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM) workshop.
    Niederhuber J. Niederhuber J. Oncologist. 2011;16(12):1665-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0388. Epub 2011 Nov 29. Oncologist. 2011. PMID: 22128116 Free PMC article.

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010. Cancer Facts and Figures 2010; pp. 1–62.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care; pp. 1–246.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. Patient-Centered Cancer Treatment Planning: Improving the Quality of Oncology Care. Summary of a Workshop; pp. 1–66.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century; pp. 1–337.
    1. Lee C, Belkora JK, Chang Y, et al. The quality of decisions about breast cancer surgery. Presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; October 18–21, 2009; Hollywood, CA.

Publication types