A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
- PMID: 22128251
- PMCID: PMC3225340
- DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S25463
A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate drug use, prescribing patterns, and comorbidities among patients with migraine in a large pharmacy claims database.
Methods: 104,625 migraine subjects (identified according to the criteria in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] for migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use) and an equal number of control patients were selected from a de-identified claims database; the prevalence of patients with migraine-specific claims was determined. Patient demographics, migraine-related medication use, other psychotropic medication use, and comorbidities over a 12-month period were compared between the migraine population and the control group and between migraine subgroups.
Results: Of the study population, 3.5% had a migraine diagnosis according to the ICD-9 or received a migraine-specific acute medication. Compared with controls, migraine patients had significantly greater disease comorbidity and higher use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and controlled painkillers; they were also more likely to receive medications used to prevent migraines and other nonmigraine psychotropic medications, such as anxiolytics and hypnotics. Among migraine patients, 66% received acute migraine-specific medication while only 20% received US Food and Drug Administration-approved migraine preventive therapy. Notably, one-third of high triptan users did not receive any kind of preventive medication. Multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities were observed at higher rates among migraine sufferers. In addition to significantly higher utilization of antidepressants compared with controls, migraine patients also received significantly more other psychotropic drugs by a factor of 2:1.
Conclusion: Acute migraine medications are commonly used and frequently dispensed at rates that raise concern of overuse; high use is often seen without any preventive medications. Furthermore, use of US Food and Drug Administration-approved preventive medications is low. Finally, patients with migraine are significantly more likely to receive other psychotropic medications. These findings suggest efforts to optimize the management of migraines could address appropriate use of triptans, increased and more effective use of migraine preventive medications, and better understanding of the use of other psychotropics.
Keywords: comorbidity; headaches; migraine preventive therapy; psychotropics; triptans.
Similar articles
-
Administrative prevalence and incidence, characteristics and prescription patterns of patients with migraine in Germany: a retrospective claims data analysis.J Headache Pain. 2020 Jul 6;21(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01154-x. J Headache Pain. 2020. PMID: 32631274 Free PMC article.
-
Consulting, diagnosis and treatment patterns in migraine: results from the Migraine in Poland cross-sectional survey.Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 May 11;18:17562864251338675. doi: 10.1177/17562864251338675. eCollection 2025. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025. PMID: 40356616 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment pattern and health care resource utilization for Taiwanese patients with migraine: a population-based study.Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1222912. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1222912. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37654430 Free PMC article.
-
[Treatment guidelines for preventive treatment of migraine].Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2008 Jun;17(2):132-48. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2008. PMID: 18686655 Review. Chinese.
-
Diagnosis and management of migraines and migraine variants.Prim Care. 2015 Jun;42(2):233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Prim Care. 2015. PMID: 25979584 Review.
Cited by
-
Practical Insights on the Identification and Management of Patients with Chronic Migraine.Pain Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):447-457. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00387-9. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Pain Ther. 2022. PMID: 35445326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validity of Algorithms for Identification of Individuals Suffering from Chronic Noncancer Pain in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.Pain Med. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):1825-1839. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa004. Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32142130 Free PMC article.
-
Medication Overuse Headache: The Reason of Headache That Common and Preventable.Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Aug;50(Suppl 1):S47-S51. doi: 10.4274/Npa.y7264. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013. PMID: 28360584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of erenumab and onabotulinumtoxinA on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization as migraine prevention in the United States.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1157-1170. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21060. Epub 2021 May 17. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021. PMID: 33998825 Free PMC article.
-
Real-time sensing of neurotransmitters by functionalized nanopores embedded in a single live cell.Mol Biomed. 2021 Feb 28;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s43556-021-00026-3. Mol Biomed. 2021. PMID: 35006433 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Headache Foundation. Categories of Headache. [Accessed July 14, 2010]. Available from: http://www.headaches.org/press/NHF_Press_Kits/Press_Kits_-_Categories_of....
-
- The global burden of disease: 2004 update Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004updat...Accessed July 14, 2010
-
- Hawkins K, Wang S, Rupnow M. Direct cost burden among insured US employees with migraine. Headache. 2008;48(4):553–563. - PubMed
-
- Hawkins K, Wang S, Rupnow M. Indirect cost burden of migraine in the Unites States. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(4):368–374. - PubMed
-
- Silberstein SD for the US Headache Consortium. Practice parameter: Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(6):754–762. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources