Effect of pregnancy on emtricitabine pharmacokinetics

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe emtricitabine pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and postpartum.

Methods: The International Maternal Pediatric and Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT), formerly Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG), study P1026s is a prospective pharmacokinetic study of HIV-infected pregnant women taking antiretrovirals for clinical indications, including a cohort taking emtricitabine 200 mg once daily. Intensive steady-state 24-hour emtricitabine pharmacokinetic profiles were performed during the third trimester and 6-12 weeks postpartum, and on maternal and umbilical cord blood samples collected at delivery. Emtricitabine was measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with a quantification limit of 0.0118 mg/L. The target emtricitabine area under the concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to 24 hours post dose (AUC(0-24) ), was ≥7 mg h/L (≤30% reduction from the typical AUC of 10 mg h/L in nonpregnant historical controls). Third-trimester and postpartum pharmacokinetics were compared within subjects.

Results: Twenty-six women had pharmacokinetics assessed during the third trimester (median 35 weeks of gestation) and 22 postpartum (median 8 weeks postpartum). Mean [90% confidence interval (CI)] emtricitabine pharmacokinetic parameters during the third trimester vs. postpartum were, respectively: AUC: 8.0 (7.1-8.9) vs. 9.7 (8.6-10.9) mg h/L (P = 0.072); apparent clearance (CL/F): 25.0 (22.6-28.3) vs. 20.6 (18.4-23.2) L/h (P = 0.025); 24 hour post dose concentration (C(24) ): 0.058 (0.037-0.063) vs. 0.085 (0.070-0.010) mg/L (P = 0.006). The mean cord:maternal ratio was 1.2 (90% CI 1.0-1.5). The viral load was <400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL in 24 of 26 women in the third trimester, in 24 of 26 at delivery, and in 15 of 19 postpartum. Within-subject comparisons demonstrated significantly higher CL/F and significantly lower C(24) during pregnancy; however, the C(24) was well above the inhibitory concentration 50%, or drug concentration that suppresses viral replication by half (IC(50) ) in all subjects.

Conclusions: While we found higher emtricitabine CL/F and lower C(24) and AUC during pregnancy compared with postpartum, these changes were not sufficiently large to warrant dose adjustment during pregnancy. Umbilical cord blood concentrations were similar to maternal concentrations.

Fig. 1

Log plot of individual plasma concentration–time curves of emtricitabine in 26 HIV-1-infected pregnant women antepartum (solid line) and the estimated 50th percentile concentration–time curve for nonpregnant HIV-infected historical adult controls (heavy dot-dashed line).

Fig. 2

Log plot of individual plasma concentration–time curves of emtricitabine in 22 HIV-1-infected women postpartum (solid line) and the estimated 50th percentile concentration–time curve for nonpregnant HIV-infected historical adult controls (heavy dot-dashed line).

Fig. 3

Log plot of median emtricitabine concentration–time curves with 95% confidence intervals during the third trimester (heavy dashed line; n = 26) and postpartum (dotted line; n = 22), and the estimated 50th percentile concentration–time curve for nonpregnant HIV-infected historical adult controls (thin solid line). IQR, interquartile range.