Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec 1;12(11):949-56.
doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.11.18368. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Analytic model for academic research productivity having factors, interactions and implications

Affiliations
Review

Analytic model for academic research productivity having factors, interactions and implications

Scott Kern. Cancer Biol Ther. .

Abstract

Financial support is dear in academia and will tighten further. How can the research mission be accomplished within new restraints? A model is presented for evaluating source components of academic research productivity. It comprises six factors: funding; investigator quality; efficiency of the research institution; the research mix of novelty, incremental advancement, and confirmatory studies; analytic accuracy; and passion. Their interactions produce output and patterned influences between factors. Strategies for optimizing output are enabled.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A schematic summary of the factor model presented. Variables influencing the output can be nested within six parental conceptual containers, the “alphas” arrayed at the top of this schematic. The model is not additive, but treats alphas as multiplicative factors. A deficiency in an alpha will impair the output regardless of improvements made in other, more visible and popular input variables. Productivity is a rate and is an expression of efficiency that is independently meaningful only when made relative to a reference unit; it is not equivalent to total production or output.

References

    1. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schubert A. Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics. 2009;78:559–65. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2208-3. - DOI
    1. Cole S, Cole JR. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. Am Sociol Rev. 1967;32:377–90. doi: 10.2307/2091085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDade LA, Maddison DR, Guralnick R, Piwowar HA, Jameson ML, Helgen KM, et al. Biology needs a modern assessment system for professional productivity. Bioscience. 2001;61:619–25. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.8. - DOI
    1. Leisyte L, Horta H. Academic knowledge production, diffusion, and commercialization: policies, practices and perspectives. Sci Public Policy. 2011;38:422–4. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267697. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources