Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 24:2:336.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00336. eCollection 2011.

Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching study

Affiliations

Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching study

Jelle Demanet et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The present study focused on the interplay between arousal, valence, and cognitive control. To this end, we investigated how arousal and valence associated with affective stimuli influenced cognitive flexibility when switching between tasks voluntarily. Three hypotheses were tested. First, a valence hypothesis that states that the positive valence of affective stimuli will facilitate both global and task-switching performance because of increased cognitive flexibility. Second, an arousal hypothesis that states that arousal, and not valence, will specifically impair task-switching performance by strengthening the previously executed task-set. Third, an attention hypothesis that states that both cognitive and emotional control ask for limited attentional resources, and predicts that arousal will impair both global and task-switching performance. The results showed that arousal affected task-switching but not global performance, possibly by phasic modulations of the noradrenergic system that reinforces the previously executed task. In addition, positive valence only affected global performance but not task-switching performance, possibly by phasic modulations of dopamine that stimulates the general ability to perform in a multitasking environment.

Keywords: IAPS; affective stimuli; cognitive control; emotional control; task-switching; voluntary task-switching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic overview of a trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reaction times as a function of task transition and trial type.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Error rates as a function of task transition and trial type.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scheme of the application of the noradrenalin account of Verguts and Notebaert (2009) on the switch cost in VTS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarts E., van Holstein M., Cools R. (2011). Striatal dopamine and the interface between motivation and cognition. Front. Psychol. 2, 163.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00163 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allport A., Styles E. A., Hsieh S. (1994). “Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks,” in Attention and performance XV, eds Umilta C., Moscovitch M. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 421–452
    1. Arrington C. M., Logan G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychol. Sci. 15, 610–61510.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrington C. M., Logan G. D. (2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 683–70210.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrington C. M., Yates M. M. (2009). The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 660–66510.3758/PBR.16.4.660 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources