Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:11:e46.
Epub 2011 Nov 23.

Chest wall reconstruction with strattice in an immunosuppressed patient

Chest wall reconstruction with strattice in an immunosuppressed patient

Karen M Kaplan et al. Eplasty. 2011.

Abstract

We report successful reconstruction of a challenging composite chest wall defect in an immunocompromised patient using a biologic mesh. Infection results in significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Thus, reconstruction in this population requires careful selection of appropriate materials to repair the defect. A 26-year-old woman with a cardiac paraganglioma required resection of the heart, portions of the great vessels, several ribs, and a large portion of the sternum, with subsequent orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Titanium plates were used to restore sternal continuity and Strattice was used for chest wall reconstruction. Strattice was selected due to its ability to become incorporated and resist wound infection, to provide stability to the rib cage, and to protect the newly transplanted heart. In our experience, Strattice provides a viable alternative to other biologics and is a safer alternative to synthetic mesh for chest wall reconstruction in immunocompromised patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The intraoperative specimen of heart, great vessels, and adjacent structures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 10 × 10 cm2 chest wall defect after en bloc resection of specimen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative photos showing the biologic mesh secured in place to replace the missing segment of chest wall.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Computed tomographic image shows stable internal reconstruction at 9 months with no fluid collection around the graft.
Figure 5
Figure 5
At 14-month follow-up, the scar is well healed with no signs of infection or dehiscence. A prior keloid on breast and mild keloid from sternotomy incision are present.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hertz MI, Aurora P, Christie JD, et al. Scientific registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: introduction to the 2009 annual reports. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:989–1049. - PubMed
    1. Arnold PG, Pairolero PC. Chest-wall reconstruction: an account of 500 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(5):804–10. - PubMed
    1. Hirai S, Nobuto H, Yokota K, et al. Surgical resection and reconstruction for primary malignant sternal tumor. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;15(3):182–5. - PubMed
    1. Chase CW, Franklin JD, Guest DP, Barker DE. Internal fixation of the sternum in median sternotomy dehiscence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(6):1667–73. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia DS, Bowen JC, Money SR, et al. The incidence, morbidity, and mortality of surgical procedures after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Surg. 1997;225(6):686–93. discussion 693-4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources