Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011:2011:362518.
doi: 10.1155/2011/362518. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?

E Gillet et al. J Pregnancy. 2011.

Abstract

Objective: To compare prelabour caesarean section (CS) rates in older nulliparous women with a term singleton baby in cephalic presentation conceiving spontaneously and through IVF/ICSI. When the latter women would ask for CS, how willing are gynaecologists to comply with that request?

Methods: A population-based retrospective (1995-2009) cohort study, conducted in Northern Belgium. A comparison of 1,866 nulliparous women pregnant after IVF/ICSI and 15,228 controls is made. An anonymous postal questionnaire is sent to all Belgian gynaecologists.

Result: Both groups are comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, and birth weight. Prelabour CS is more often performed in women who conceived through IVF/ICSI compared to those who conceived spontaneously (9.2% versus 6.3%, P < 0.001). One in five gynaecologists agrees with the maternal request.

Conclusion: IVF/ICSI pregnancies in older nulliparous women more often end in a prelabour CS and a substantial number of gynaecologists go along with a nonmedical reason for CS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Answers of Belgian gynaecologists concerning a “nulliparous woman of 38 years, pregnant through IVF after 4 attempts and requesting a prelabour caesarean section”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Seminars in Perinatology. 2006;30(5):235–241. - PubMed
    1. Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J. Rising cesarean delivery rates the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2009;64(2):115–119. - PubMed
    1. Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;109(1):57–66. - PubMed
    1. Robson SJ, Tan WS, Adeyemi A, Dear KBG. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia. Birth. 2009;36(3):208–212. - PubMed
    1. Nilstun T, Habiba M, Lingman G, Saracci R, Da Frè M, Cuttini M. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach? BMC Medical Ethics. 2008;9, article 11 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms