Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?
- PMID: 22132336
- PMCID: PMC3216354
- DOI: 10.1155/2011/362518
Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?
Abstract
Objective: To compare prelabour caesarean section (CS) rates in older nulliparous women with a term singleton baby in cephalic presentation conceiving spontaneously and through IVF/ICSI. When the latter women would ask for CS, how willing are gynaecologists to comply with that request?
Methods: A population-based retrospective (1995-2009) cohort study, conducted in Northern Belgium. A comparison of 1,866 nulliparous women pregnant after IVF/ICSI and 15,228 controls is made. An anonymous postal questionnaire is sent to all Belgian gynaecologists.
Result: Both groups are comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, and birth weight. Prelabour CS is more often performed in women who conceived through IVF/ICSI compared to those who conceived spontaneously (9.2% versus 6.3%, P < 0.001). One in five gynaecologists agrees with the maternal request.
Conclusion: IVF/ICSI pregnancies in older nulliparous women more often end in a prelabour CS and a substantial number of gynaecologists go along with a nonmedical reason for CS.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33752633 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization.Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(2):277-83. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23971259
-
Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 22;14:285. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-285. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25148697 Free PMC article.
-
Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Mar;83(3):262-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004. PMID: 14995922
-
Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.18930. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29114987 Review.
Cited by
-
Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33752633 Free PMC article.
-
Transition to motherhood following the use of assisted reproductive technologies: Experiences of women in Ghana.PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0266721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266721. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35452460 Free PMC article.
-
Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jul 20;112(29-30):489-95. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015. PMID: 26249251 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peripartum and postpartum outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancy following ART: a retrospective cohort study from two Italian obstetric units.Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jul 24;2018(3):hoy012. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy012. eCollection 2018. Hum Reprod Open. 2018. PMID: 30895253 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.J Pregnancy. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2793296. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793296. eCollection 2020. J Pregnancy. 2020. PMID: 33274077 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Seminars in Perinatology. 2006;30(5):235–241. - PubMed
-
- Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J. Rising cesarean delivery rates the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2009;64(2):115–119. - PubMed
-
- Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;109(1):57–66. - PubMed
-
- Robson SJ, Tan WS, Adeyemi A, Dear KBG. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia. Birth. 2009;36(3):208–212. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical