Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries
- PMID: 2213287
- DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.001632
Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries
Abstract
Texture-discrimination tasks reveal a pronounced performance asymmetry depending on which texture represents the foreground region (small area) and which represents the ground (large area). This asymmetry implies that some global processes are involved in the segmentation process. We examined this problem within the context of the texture-segmentation algorithm, assuming two filtering stages. The first stage uses spatial frequency and orientation-selective (Gabor) filters, whereas the second stage is formed by low-resolution edge-detection filters. The presence and location of texture borders are indicated by significant responses in the second stage. Spurious texture borders may occur owing to textural local variabilities (such as orientation randomization), which are enhanced by the first stage. We suggest that these spurious borders act as background noise and thus limit performance in texture-discrimination tasks. The noise level depends on which texture occupies the ground in the display. We tested this model on numerous pairs of textures and found remarkably good correlation with human performance. A prediction of the model, namely, that discrimination asymmetry will be reduced when textural elements have identical orientation, was tested psychophysically and confirmed.
Similar articles
-
Effects of foreground scale in texture discrimination tasks: performance is size, shape, and content specific.Spat Vis. 1993;7(4):293-310. doi: 10.1163/156856893x00450. Spat Vis. 1993. PMID: 8110630
-
Quantification of local symmetry: application to texture discrimination.Spat Vis. 1994;8(4):515-30. doi: 10.1163/156856894x00152. Spat Vis. 1994. PMID: 7772555
-
Asymmetries in visual texture discrimination.Spat Vis. 1989;4(1):31-44. doi: 10.1163/156856889x00031. Spat Vis. 1989. PMID: 2486924
-
Fechner, information, and shape perception.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2353-78. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0197-4. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21879419 Review.
-
Texture classification and segmentation algorithms in man and machines.Spat Vis. 1993;7(4):277-92. doi: 10.1163/156856893x00441. Spat Vis. 1993. PMID: 8110629 Review.
Cited by
-
Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search.PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 14;13(12):e1005882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882. eCollection 2017 Dec. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017. PMID: 29240813 Free PMC article.
-
Synergy of spatial frequency and orientation bandwidth in texture segregation.J Vis. 2021 Feb 3;21(2):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.2.5. J Vis. 2021. PMID: 33560290 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0126449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126449. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26057620 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple groups of orientation-selective visual mechanisms underlying rapid orientated-line detection.Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Sep 7;265(1406):1605-13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0478. Proc Biol Sci. 1998. PMID: 9753784 Free PMC article.
-
Interocular transfer in perceptual learning of a pop-out discrimination task.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7358-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7358. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. PMID: 8692998 Free PMC article.