Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: national data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization
- PMID: 22133657
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.009
Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: national data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization
Abstract
Background: Vasectomy has been found to be a highly cost-effective contraceptive method. For couples, tubal sterilization and vasectomy have the same result, but the two methods are used by different segments of the population.
Study design: We conducted an analysis of data from male and female samples of the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth, nationally representative samples of men and women in the United States aged 15-44 years.
Results: Among married men, 13.1% reported vasectomies (95% confidence interval 10.4%-16.3%), compared to 21.1% (17.8%-24.9%) of married women who reported tubal sterilizations. Men with higher education and income had greater prevalence of vasectomy than those less educated, while women with lower education and income had the highest prevalence of tubal sterilization.
Conclusions: Efforts to promote vasectomy use need to understand the reasons behind these differences. Increasing the availability and use of vasectomy will require education about its benefits.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 25881875 Free PMC article.
-
Sterilization among currently married men in the United States, 1991.Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 May-Jun;27(3):100-7, 122. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995. PMID: 7672099
-
Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization.Fertil Steril. 2000 May;73(5):937-46. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00484-2. Fertil Steril. 2000. PMID: 10785218 Review.
-
Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States.Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):35-41, 49. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001. PMID: 11271545
-
Sterilization and its consequences.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999 Dec;54(12):766-77. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999. PMID: 10596397 Review.
Cited by
-
The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.Popul Stud (Camb). 2016;70(1):39-58. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1122209. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Popul Stud (Camb). 2016. PMID: 26792541 Free PMC article.
-
Individual- and country-level correlates of female permanent contraception use in sub-Saharan Africa.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0243316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243316. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33320877 Free PMC article.
-
Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 25881875 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Interest in Vasectomy among Latina Women and their Partners in a Community with Limited Access to Female Sterilization.J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):762-77. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0083. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016. PMID: 27180707 Free PMC article.
-
Invited commentary: reproductive organ surgeries and breast cancer risk--apples, oranges, or fruit cocktail?Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Mar 15;177(6):500-3. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws438. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Am J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23416446 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical