Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Dec;140(6):790-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.025.

Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction

Tung Nguyen et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Bone-anchored maxillary protraction has been shown to be an effective treatment modality for the correction of Class III malocclusions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3-dimensional changes in the maxilla, the surrounding hard and soft tissues, and the circummaxillary sutures after bone-anchored maxillary protraction treatment.

Methods: Twenty-five consecutive skeletal Class III patients between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean, 11.10 ± 1.1 years) were treated with Class III intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (2 in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and 2 in the anterior mandible). Cone-beam computed tomographs were taken before initial loading and 1 year out. Three-dimensional models were generated from the tomographs, registered on the anterior cranial base, superimposed, and analyzed by using color maps.

Results: The maxilla showed a mean forward displacement of 3.7 mm, and the zygomas and the maxillary incisors came forward 3.7 and 4.3 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: This treatment approach produced significant orthopedic changes in the maxilla and the zygomas in growing Class III patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Skull illustrating the anatomic locations of the bone anchors.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Intermaxillary elastics to anchors with a bite plate retainer to assist with bite opening.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The isolines, displayed as a black circle or a dot, show the regions with the greatest displacement (positive in red; negative in blue) between the T1 and T2 superimpositions. These isolines measure the closest distance between the superimpositions. The top image shows the isolines representing the regions of greatest outward displacement in the maxilla and zygomas, and the bottom image illustrates the regions with maximum inward displacement.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Box plots of the growth and response to treatment at each anatomic region.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Three-dimensional skeletal color maps of superimpositions of T2 over T1 registered at the anterior cranial base with a scale of –5 to +5 mm. Red represents outward displace of T2 in relation to T1; blue represents inward displacement of T2 in relation to T1.
Fig 6
Fig 6
Lateral views of the skeletal semitransparency superimpositions for 9 patients. T1 models are represented by solid red; superimposed T2 models are shown as semitransparent white mesh.
Fig 7
Fig 7
Frontal views of 3D soft-tissue color maps of superimpositions for 9 patients showing a large range of responses.
Fig 8
Fig 8
Lateral views of the soft-tissue semitransparency superimpositions for 9 patients. Note the range of soft-tissue responses from 1 patient to another.
Fig 9
Fig 9
Distraction of circummaxillary sutures at T2 (red arrows). Note the opening of the zygomaticofrontal, zygomaticotemporal, zygomaticomaxillary, and transverse palatine sutures.

Comment in

  • Bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Mathur A, Toshniwal NG, Kharbanda OP, Thakur A. Mathur A, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 May;141(5):530-1; author reply 531-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.003. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22554741 No abstract available.

References

    1. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:583–92. - PubMed
    1. Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:204–12. - PubMed
    1. Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:211–21. - PubMed
    1. Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:253–62. - PubMed
    1. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:571–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms